My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/27/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2022
>
Agenda - Council - 09/27/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:39:02 PM
Creation date
9/27/2022 3:31:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/27/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
260
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Manager Larson shared the way that the property is platted, there is a drainage easement, <br />and it is consistent with the drainage easement. <br />Mr. Patrow stated the drainage and utility easement goes right through the retention pond. <br />Planning Manager Larson said this is standard. <br />Christy Haid, 7600 163rd Lane, said the water issue has been put aside like it is no big deal and she <br />would like to see evidence that it will not be a problem. <br />Acting Mayor Riley stated that the water issue is not what they are talking about tonight and it is <br />not being pushed off. It is actually set to be discussed on Thursday at the Lower Rum River <br />Watershed Management Organization (LRRWMO) and they will be the definitive answer on the <br />water issue. <br />Ms. Haid shared this is frustrating as a resident who lives right near the site. <br />Acting Mayor Riley said this has already been decided by the Council and will be discussed by <br />the LRRWMO. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff asked Staff if there are any development agreements that have been <br />written that allow for or leave open developer costs for future improvements that may be required. <br />He used the example of if in a few years a turn lane was needed, would there be a space in the <br />agreement or a time period where it would be assessed back to the properties as opposed to a <br />taxpayer burden. <br />Planning Manager Larson said that through the approval process with the traffic study, if <br />something were identified as a potential improvement, when those portions of the project were <br />reviewed a condition requiring an assessment agreement for construction of that in the future <br />should have been in the study. <br />A roll call vote was performed: <br />Councilmember Musgrove aye <br />Councilmember Specht aye <br />Councilmember Howell aye <br />Councilmember Woestehoff nay <br />Councilmember Heineman aye <br />Acting Mayor Riley aye <br />Motion carried. <br />8. MAYOR, COUNCIL AND STAFF INPUT <br />City Council / September 13, 2022 <br />Page 17 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.