My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 09/13/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2022
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 09/13/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 10:33:50 AM
Creation date
9/30/2022 9:09:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
09/13/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Musgrove said yes and that she would also like to hear some of the options of <br />different things, such as, Ramsey paying for a booth and Game Fair paying for the services, or half <br />of the services, and what portion would come from the EDA and what portion would be paid out <br />from Game Fair. <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Riley stated this is a perfectly good discussion for the future; however, there is still <br />the present discussion of half of the invoiced amount from this year. He added that it seems like <br />the consensus of the Council is to go with the 50% and that money come out of the EDA fund <br />rather than the police fund. <br /> <br />Councilmember Heineman stated that it seems like the City is subsidizing the invoice quite a bit, <br />because if it is only $800 for a booth and the City is paying for parking for the Staff, it sounds like <br />if the City bills Game Fair for the money going forward and then the City just paid their own way <br />it would save money. He asked if Ramsey could just pay the 50% that Game Fair is asking this <br />year and in the future make it a practice for Ramsey to pay their own way for a booth and charge <br />Game Fair the full amount. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woestehoff stated he agreed with Councilmember Heineman and echoed <br />Councilmember Specht’s point that Ramsey gets a lot of publicity from the Game Fair. He added <br />that he pulled up the information and a 20’X20’ booth at Game Fair is $1,700. He added he is <br />unsure if every exhibitor gets their logo on all of the marketing materials. He agreed that his <br />consensus for now would be to pay the other half that Game Fair is asking Ramsey to pay and <br />move forward with other discussions for coming years. <br /> <br />Councilmember Heineman stated that if the total value of the free booth and the advertising equals <br />the difference in the invoice, then he thinks it is okay to continue to move forward with that, but if <br />the total value is less than the half of the invoice then a different discussion needs to be had about <br />what is more beneficial to Ramsey. He emphasized the need to determine if Ramsey is losing <br />money on the agreement or saving money. <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Riley stated it seems the Council is in agreement with this year’s total of paying the <br />50% coming out of the EDA fund. He added he imagines that Coca-Cola and the other high level <br />sponsors pay much more than $5,000 for their sponsorship; however, this discussion can be had <br />later to quantify the value. <br /> <br />The consensus of the Council was to pay the other 50% of the invoice out of the EDA fund as well <br />as making it a point to revisit this before the next Game Fair event. <br /> <br />2.02: Final 2023 Budget/Levy Review Before Preliminary Adoption on 9-27-2022 <br /> <br />Finance Director Lund discussed the Staff report and gave a summary of what was discussed at <br />the last work session on August 23. She stated the net result of removing the police squad video <br />cameras and the unmanned aerial vehicle was $186,000 reduced from the tax levy. She explained <br />the preliminary amount that would be presented at the September 27 meeting would be <br />$18,292,245, representing an increase of almost $2,979,000 or 19.64% over last year. She added <br />that this number does include the additional road debt so there would be a 15 year levy in the <br />City Council Work Session / September 13, 2022 <br />Page 4 of 16 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.