My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 11/15/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2000 - 2009
>
2005
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 11/15/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 2:30:03 PM
Creation date
11/10/2005 3:48:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
11/15/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. Allows for the redevelopment the,current PW site. (More tax generating property) <br /> <br />Disadvantages: <br />l. Not enough land in the future. <br />2. No expansion possibilities. <br />3. Residential property nearby. <br /> <br />cquisition of landfall property (see attached map) <br /> Advantages: <br /> <br />1. Insignificant loss to tax revenue. <br />'2. Site backs up to the landfill. <br />3. Residential property separation. <br />4. Allows for the redevelopment the current PW site. (More tax generating property) <br />5. Future expansion opportunities. <br />6. Located on a State Aid route (Sunwood Drive) <br /> <br />Disadvantages: <br />1. MPCA controlled land <br /> <br />The current site is adequately sized for our immediate operations and Staff feels that there <br />will be enough land tbr the next few years. However, there will continue to be space <br />needs issues relative to the equipment storage and employment base as our population <br />contimtes to grow. Staff feels that the Public Works Department should continue to <br />l'ollow the same path that was initiated last year by providing solutions to these issues <br />that can be transferred to our "permanent" site. We would also recommend that a <br />Col~sultant should be hired before any "permanent" structures are built to help us with <br />space needs planning. We do not feel that this should be done next year due to budget <br />concerns, however, we do feel that it should be done within the next 2~3 years. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />StaFf' t'eels that the advantages for the landfill proPerty option far outweigh the <br />disadvantages and therefore recommend moving forward with-discussions with the <br />MI?CA to further explore the possibilities of this option. <br /> <br />Action: <br /> <br />Based upon discussion <br /> <br />Reviewed By: <br />City Administrator <br />Director of Public Works / Fire Chief <br /> <br />I)¥V: I 1/15/05 <br /> <br />39 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.