My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Parks and Recreation Commission - 10/13/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2005
>
Minutes - Parks and Recreation Commission - 10/13/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 11:17:56 AM
Creation date
11/18/2005 12:35:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
10/13/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I'afl<s/[ J t il i ties Supervisor Riverblood stated Puma, at this time, could not be moved because they <br />~cc(Ic(l to maintain a hard surface for a second access into the existing development and could be <br />i,b~tndoncd but needs to be maintained at this time. <br /> <br />l)::ut wl~tt is best f'or thc area and they would take the park dedication and release the funds when <br /> <br />~l'hc ('ot~m~ission discussed other park areas that are close to this development. <br /> <br />(~ommis~ioner Shryock noted she would be cautious to put a park facility into this area until the <br />ac[joining areas are developed. <br /> <br />[*;t~'l<s/[ Jtilities Supervisor Riverblood stated the advantage of developing the recreational area <br />s¢>o~cr th,m later is the grading is included along with the development and trees and sod can be <br />c:-;tabli sl~ccl sooner. Parking could be placed elsewhere in the interim. <br /> <br />Johns agreed and did not think they would want to go too far until future <br />is started. <br /> <br />m/ssioner Pontius wondered if 4.2 acres was enough for a park in that area. <br /> <br />('hairl~Crson Johns thought it was because of the connection to Itasca Parks. <br /> <br />~.,l~t~o~ l~y Commissioner Ostrum, seconded by Commissioner Pontius, to recommend park <br />d,xlication [bi' Summerset Meadow be satisfied through a combination of land and cash with trail <br />cl{:clicati<)n tis proposed. <br /> <br /> carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Johns, Commissioners Ostrum, Pontius, Lehman, <br />altd Shryock. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner LaMere. <br /> <br />Park and Recreation Commission/October 13, 2005 <br /> Page 4 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.