My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/22/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2005
>
Agenda - Council - 11/22/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 2:00:09 PM
Creation date
11/18/2005 2:16:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/22/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
336
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Van Scoy questioned if Mr. Shellerud will purchase the parcels and complete a <br />swap with the City, with the City having ownership of the parcels. <br />Mr. Shellerud replied that is correct. This would need to happen before the plat could be <br />recorded, so many simultaneous things would be worked on, and are being worked on at this <br />time. <br />Chairperson Nixt inquired how many lots would be eliminated if the zoning were to remain as <br />single family. He indicated given the reconfiguration presented earlier tonight in the southeast <br />corner of the plat he would have no problem finding a rational basis to approve those smaller lot <br />sizes, but that would be appropriate for a variance, not a PUD. <br />Mr. Shellerud explained less than half of the lots being proposed tonight are 70 feet wide, most <br />are 74 feet wide. The reason GM Homes has requested the 70 foot lots is because they have <br />made the commitment to staff and the City Council that the building pads would be 50 feet wide, <br />which gives them l0 feet of open :space on each- side of the homes., If the site_ remains. under R- I <br />zoning there would be 15 feet between structures, while this proposal would have a minimum of <br />20 feet between structures. That is the reason for the PUD request. They are trying to make the <br />streetscape as open and green as possible with as much room between homes as possible <br />Chairperson Mixt stated -.he is troubled by the PLD, but there are clearreasons_for it:. He is not <br />generally in favor of smaller lot sizes in a clearly single family neighborhood; but this area will <br />have Alpine Drive to the north_ Nowthen Boulevard to the west, a new public itreet to the east, <br />and Quasi -Public use to the south <br />Commissioner Van Scoy inquired if the safety concerns of the adjoining neighborhoods will be <br />addressed. <br />Mr. Shellerud explained discussions during work sessions he- attended hinged on -the fact,tlat the <br />streets need to be hooked up for the accessibility of safety vehicles. Regarding the question <br />about the street or driveway that comes up to City Hall at this point, they will be widening the <br />street according to City standards almost back to the parking lot at City Hall. They are proposing <br />a reconstruction of that road and improvement of the road base. He explained the extension of <br />Helium Street through their development and up to Alpine Drive is an extra four feet wide so <br />emergency vehicles can travel it with relative safety, <br />Commissioner Shepherd inquired if there will be a recommendation made regarding the park, <br />which was discussed previously. <br />Chairperson Nixt replied the issue is how to protect the land if it is not developed with a Quasi - <br />Public use, which he does not have a solution for. <br />City Engineer Linton indicated the Park Board provided comments on this plan. One suggestion <br />was a potential playground situated in the southeast corner of the site for the new Fire Station, <br />adjacent to the houses. The Fire Chief was comfortable with that suggestion. The Park Board <br />• <br />Planning Commission/November 3, 2005 <br />a-250— Page 1S of 31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.