Laserfiche WebLink
Member Jeffrey requested a review of the conversation with the developer to come back to the <br />EDA. <br /> <br />Chairperson Riley expressed concern with the statement included in the staff report that the <br />developer has made it clear this project cannot go forward without financial incentives from the <br />City of Ramsey. Economic Development/TIF Specialist Sullivan replied the developer <br />approached staff and asked if the City would be able to assist them with this project. The <br />developer was informed to negotiate the deal and come back to the City to discuss the assistance. <br />The developer has two purchase agreements that are contingent on City participation, and has <br />made it clear that City participation is necessary. It has been the EDA's policy to create job <br />growth, and this TIF assistance is specifically tied to the job growth from the project. <br /> <br />Economic Development Consultant Mulrooney explained this is a different piece of property <br />with very limited development potential because of the way it was platted. The adjoining parcel <br />would be landlocked unless it were to be developed by Command Corporation. The City is <br />playing a good role in terms of matching up those two parcels and making it a developable piece. <br />It will likely serve the City well to have this project proceed, filling what would otherwise likely <br />be vacant parcels for some time to come. <br /> <br />Motion by Member Strommen, seconded by Member Jeffrey, to recommend to the City Council <br />that the City of Ramsey participate financially in the Minks Custom Home project, and that staff <br />express the concerns to the developer regarding the company's ability to expand based on the <br />price and availability of building materials, and that the EDA be informed about the discussion <br />with the developer in a staff update. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Riley, Members Strommen, Jeffrey, Kiefer, and <br />Steffen. Voting No: None. Absent: Members Elvig, Gromberg, and LeTourneau. <br /> <br />Case #3: Amoco De~nolition <br /> <br />Economic Development/TIF Specialist Sullivan reviewed that at the July 13, 2005 EDA meeting <br />discussion involving the acquisition and demolition of the Amoco station on Hwy 47 took place. <br />The suggestion by the EDA was to look at the look at the interest of a public demolition of the <br />building after acquisition. The intention of the public demolition would serve as a promotion of <br />the "Community Revitalization Program" as well as marketing for the development of city <br />owned land. Staff has informally polled members at the council and staff levels regarding the <br />interest in having a public demolition of the Amoco station. The response has been <br />overwhelmingly in favor of having some sort of public demolition. He noted a public demolition <br />brings many logistical questions to the forefront. <br /> <br />Member Jeffrey stated there should be consideration regarding likely questions from the public <br />about what will be done with the site and plans for the walking bridge over Highway 47. <br />Economic Development/TIF Specialist Sullivan indicated he has envisioned an office condo <br />project for this site. Member Jeffrey noted there was discussion at one time about leaving the <br />easement in place in case it is needed for Highway 47. He noted this site is a nice connector to <br />the park. <br /> <br />Economic Development Authority/September 7, 2005 <br /> Page 4 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />