Laserfiche WebLink
D <br /> <br />E <br /> <br />South Leg - Northbound Approach (200' Length) <br />1. Per AUAR <br /> · No proposed Improvements <br /> <br />Per MOU <br /> - Widen and reconstruct south leg to provide <br /> two (2) SB Thru Lanes (or 1 Thru Lane and <br /> i 0' shoulder), a raised conc. median, a NB to <br /> WB Left Turn Lane, a NB Tlm.t Lane and NB <br /> tO EB Right Turn Lane (section similar to <br /> Armstrong Blvd.) <br /> <br />Armstrong Blvd. Const. Cost w/o <br />crossing pad and gates <br />= (1,~41,090 -240,000 - 275,000 x 1.35= $ 980,625) <br /> <br />Estimated Cost to City = (200/2475) (980,625) = $ 79,250 <br /> <br />Added Cost to City for South Leg = $ 79,250 <br /> <br />Intersection Resignalization <br />1. Per AUAR <br /> · Resignalize Intersection <br /> <br />Estimated Cost per 8/25/03 Report = <br />($250,000 x 1.44% OH) <br /> <br />007,500 <br /> <br />Per MOU <br /> · Resignalize Intersection <br /> (Cost Participation is 90% State and 10% City) <br /> <br />Estimated Cost to City = (10%) $337,500 = $ 33,750 <br /> <br />Cost Savings to City for Resignalization -- $ 303,750 <br /> <br />Summary of Additional Costs/Savings to City at TH #10 axed Sunfish Lake Blvd. <br /> <br />1. West Leg - Eastbound Approach = $ 0 <br />2. East Leg- Westbound Approach = + $ 42,400 <br />3. North Leg - Southbound Approach = $ 0 <br />4. South_tee= - Northbound Approach = + $ 79,250. <br />5. Resignalization =- $ 303,750 <br /> <br />Total Cost Savings to City for TH # 10 <br />- Sunfish Lake Blvd. Imp. per <br />MOU vs. AUAR <br /> <br />182,100 <br /> <br />G:~lVhllucilml\Aralnsey\3 172\r;[31721ni/igntion measures.doc Page 9 <br /> <br /> <br />