Laserfiche WebLink
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chair Cook, Commissioners Johns, Asfahl, Droegemueller, <br />Ostmm, and Rolfe. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case/t2: Review Multi-unit Park Dedication Rates <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos stated that at the regular Park Commission meeting in February, <br />the Commission requested that a survey be conducted on the cash park dedication rates for multi- <br />family dwellings and apartments. The Commission was presented with a 50-city survey <br />completed in September of 1999. The survey shows that approximately 55% of the cities make <br />no distinction between single-family units and multi-family units for park dedication. In <br />addition, very few cities show a difference between duplexes and townhomes and traditional <br />single-family structures. <br /> <br />Commissioner Droegemueller suggested reducing the multi-unit park dedication fee to <br />something that would be more reasonable to the builder, but then charge a special assessment to <br />the property on a yearly basis, for example charge a $400 per unit fee up-front and then assess <br />$10 per apartment unit yearly. <br /> <br />Commissioner Rolfe questioned how it would be handled on a long term basis. <br /> <br />Commissioner Droegemueller suggested creating a City policy that would be reviewable at any <br />Park Commission meeting or have a per case policy. He explained that people living in <br />apartments will use trails and green space in the area because they do not have a yard so trail <br />maintenance would become very important and justify bringing in more funds to the City. <br /> <br />Commissioner Ostrum requested that Staff have the City Attorney review the possibility of <br />charging the special assessment. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johns inquired if the multi-unit policy would affect townhomes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Droegemueller replied that he was referring to apartments or rental units. <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos stated that there could be administrative concerns with the <br />special assessment if the property goes through bankruptcy, not paying taxes or change of <br />ownership. <br /> <br />Chairperson Cook replied that he would be concerned that the developer would pay the reduced <br />park dedication fee up front and then sell the building to a new owner and then the City never <br />receives the additional funds. He thinks that the City should get the money up front so that <br />recreation needs can be addressed prior to the development being completed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Droegemueller stated that he was looking for an alternative because the cost can <br />become overwhelming to a developer. <br /> <br />Park and Recreation Commission/March 9, 2000 <br /> Page 3 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />