My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 02/01/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 02/01/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2025 2:11:34 PM
Creation date
5/22/2003 9:08:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
02/01/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Johnson replied that there are cul-de-sacs in the City that are very long and could <br />use a sidewalk as well as temporary cul-de-sacs with the possibility of future expansion. <br /> <br />Chairperson Anderson noted that anything over 600 feet for a cul-de-sac would require a <br />variance and the issue could be addressed at that time. <br /> <br />The Commission directed Mr. Boos to amend the proposed ordinance to eliminate the <br />requirement for sidewalks on all cul-de-sacs in a single family zone with no possibility as a <br />through street. <br /> <br />Case #6: Review Tower Ordinance <br /> <br />Community Development Assistant Barnett stated that as a follow-up to the US West Wireless <br />application, both the Planning Commission and City Council have determined that a review of <br />the City's tower ordinance is appropriate, especially with respect to telecommunication towers <br />being placed in residential districts. The Commission was presented with information regarding <br />the ordinance and the history behind the adoption of the ordinance. <br /> <br />Chairperson Anderson noted that the Council returned the US West application to the Planning <br />Commission and.~t~q.',~va~,~a~z. In reviewing the current ordinance the only question he has is <br />whether the City~.wanted to permit towers in a residential district at all. All of the other <br />information seeme~to be very well thought out. <br /> no ' er i c -,i clear 06t v4 -¢ (0un6\ V4i$¼cc.1 t-he.. <br />Commissioner Nixt replied that under fhe Telecommunications Act, the City cannot totally <br />prohibit the towers, but they can limit where they are located. <br /> <br />Commissioner Nixt stated that the City needs to allow a reasonable locations to construct the <br />towers, but that is difficult to determine with changing technologies. <br /> <br />Commissioner Dempsey stated that if the City takes a proactive role in the location of the towers; <br />then the impact on residents is considered, which is important. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson stated that in his opinion there are locations in the northern part of the <br />City that would not impact residential areas. <br /> <br />Commissioner Nixt recommended that staff conduct more specific tower research. He suggested <br />obtaining input from an outside source as to appropriate locations for the towers. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson stated that he would like some input on appropriate height for the towers <br />and what the industry says in regards to height in comparison to other cities. <br /> <br />Commissioner Dempsey inquired as to the number of users allowed to use a tower. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/February 1, 2000 <br /> Page 8 of 10 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.