Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Jeffrey concurred. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich advised the resolution could be amended to authorize acquisition of <br />permanent utility (remove and trail) easements necessary for City Improvement Project 03-20. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig inquired about fire hydrants being located in this area. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson replied there currently is not water planned in this area; it <br />is a sewer route. Easements are purchased with the ability for both sewer and water. A water <br />main is not being planned at this time, but the ability for the water is important for the possibility <br />of subdivisions or potential developments. He explained there will not be fire hydrants located <br />in this area. Initially when they looked at the trail they knew it would not be on the south side of <br />the wetland area because the houses along 157th are so close to the wetlands that the trail could <br />not be placed there without total takes. They initially started to put the trail on the wetland <br />boundary and found some properties that were dramatically impacted. It was determined that the <br />avoidance criteria could not be met. They then tried moving some of the trail out into the <br />wetland to minimize the effect to the property owners and the wetland. Mr. Olson explained <br />staff felt the trail was necessary as the existing right-of-way cannot be used to access the sewer. <br />The trail was to fill a dual purpose; one was to provide access to the sewer and the second was to <br />connect Elmcrest Park and Central Park, which has long been included in the CIP and <br />Comprehensive Plan. Staff understands the concern about the trail in the current location. <br />Access is an issue, but it will not likely be too long before there will be subdivisions, at which <br />point there will not only be a requirement for the trail, but also for access to a local road. There <br />may be a short period of time when there is not access to the sanitary sewer, but that access will <br />be required when and if subdivision occurs. He would be in agreement with separating the trail <br />and sewer easements. He advised staff has been working with a lot of property owners, and <br />suggested staff be authorized to continue offering the trail easements to interested property <br />owners. <br /> <br />The consensus of the Council was to authorize staff to continue offering the trail easements to <br />interested property owners. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson indicated there have been discussions with the TEP Panel <br />about the location of the trails, as well as the location of the sewer. The City was specifically <br />requested to move the sewer alignment where it is located to try to minimize the amount of <br />impact to the wetland. Now that the trail will not be completed there is a little more flexibility <br />because there will not be a great deal of impact with the sewer construction. However, the <br />bottom line is that access will be needed to the manholes. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Pearson, seconded by Councilmember Jeffrey, to adopt Resolution <br />//05-12-427 authorizing the eminent domain process to acquire necessary easements for the <br />Northwest Sanitary Sewer Project with the elimination of any reference to trail easements. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Councilmember Cook stated this trail has been included in the plans for over <br />ten years and has always been planned to connect these parks. He suggested the negotiation for <br />the trail easements include a time period for the construction of the trail in the future. <br /> <br />City Council / December 13, 2005 <br />Page 24 of 37 <br /> <br /> <br />