My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 10/03/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Environmental Policy Board
>
2005
>
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 10/03/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 12:32:59 PM
Creation date
1/30/2006 12:45:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Environmental Policy Board
Document Date
10/03/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CASE # 2 <br />Review of Tree Preservation Ordinance <br />By: Chris Anderson, Zoning & Recycling Coordinator <br />Background: <br />The tree preservation ordinance has been in effect now for approximately two (2) years. After <br />working with this ordinance, it is apparent that at least certain portions of it need to be revisited. <br />Furthermore, this is a good opportunity for the new members of the EPB to become acquainted <br />with these rules and regulations. <br />The following items are enclosed for your information: <br />a. Current tree preservation ordinance (Exhibit 1) <br />b. Outline of canopy cover formula (Exhibit 2) <br />Observations: <br />The following are some additions, revisions, and/or clarifications that Staff would like to see <br />incorporated into this ordinance: <br />• In 9.24.01 (General Provisions) Subd. 4 (Definitions) <br />1. A definition for "significant tree" should be developed, which should also include a <br />minimum DBH; <br />2. The definition of boulevard needs to be revised so that it better matches the boulevard <br />definition in Section 9.02 of City Code. <br />3. Staff is looking for clarification of the purpose of the definition of a Zoning Buffer and <br />is unsure if this is necessary. <br />• In 9.24.04 (Private Trees in New Development Areas) <br />1. Subd. 3 (Plan Specifications Content), should note that all "significant trees" be <br />included on the tree preservation plan. <br />2. In Subd. 3 b. should there be a caveat for other qualified persons to conduct tree <br />inventories? <br />3. Subd. 8 a. (Planting Requirements) requires that after planting, all trees be protected <br />with a biodegradable tree tube. Staff would like to discuss this requirement. <br />4. Subd. 8 i. (Vision Clearance) should reference Section 9.11.01 (General <br />Requirements) Subd. 7 which has been established by our Public Works to maintain <br />safe and unobstructed views at intersections. <br />5. Staff would recommend considering a standard for planting distance from a residential <br />driveway for trees that are to be installed in the boulevard area. <br />6. Subd. 8 k. (Tree Preservation Tree Density Standard Calculation) states that if <br />removals exceed this standard, than replacement shall be consistent with the tree cover <br />requirements in the R-2 or R-3 zoning districts. However, the canopy cover formula <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.