Laserfiche WebLink
the idea of the project, they felt that other applications were more pertinent to their goal of <br />nonpoint source pollution reduction. <br />Recommendation: <br />NA <br />EPB Action <br />This is for informational purposes only. No action is required. <br />EPB: 12/5/05 <br />CASE # 3 <br />Review of Tree Preservation Ordinance <br />By: Chris Anderson, Zoning & Recycling Coordinator <br />Background: <br />The tree preservation ordinance has been in effect now for approximately two (2) years. After <br />working with this ordinance, it is apparent that at least certain portions of it need to be revisited. <br />Furthermore, this is a good opportunity for the new members of the EPB to become acquainted <br />with these rules and regulations. After some discussion regarding this ordinance at the October <br />meeting, a subcommittee was formed to work on some of the questions/issues. <br />The following items are enclosed for your information: <br />a. Current tree preservation ordinance (Exhibit 1) <br />Observations: <br />Most of these items were addressed at the October meeting. Based on those discussions, the <br />following revisions were recommended by the Board: <br />• In 9.24.01 (General Provisions) Subd. 4 (Definitions) <br />1. The definition of Boulevard should be removed from this subsection as it is already <br />defined in the general definitions subsection (9.02) of City Code. <br />2. The definition of Zoning Buffer should be removed from this subsection since there is <br />now a subsection specifically addressing this matter in City Code. <br />• In 9.24.04 (Private Trees in New Development Areas) <br />1. Subd. 8 a. (Planting Requirements) requires that after planting, all trees be protected <br />with a biodegradable tree tube. Consensus of the Board was to eliminate this <br />requirement. <br />