My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/23/2023
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2023
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/23/2023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:19:33 AM
Creation date
2/17/2023 3:35:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
02/23/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Manager Larson replied that staff could not recall any incidents. <br /> Commissioner Van Scoy stated that if retail were to go into I-2, the parking lot could go to the <br /> setback. He stated that perhaps using an impervious surface maximum of 75 percent or so. <br /> Commissioner Gengler stated that she would support the idea of a maximum for lot coverage but <br /> would not want to create a situation that could not be met. <br /> Planning Manager Larson commented that staff can provide suggestion that would range between <br /> 75 and 85 percent. He moved to the topic of accessory structures and asked for input. <br /> Commissioner Van Scoy stated that he would support that allowance if the maximum building <br /> footprint included all buildings. <br /> Planning Manager Larson confirmed that would be the intention. He stated that if the building <br /> were already at the maximum footprint allowed,the business would not be eligible for an accessory <br /> structure. He provided more details on the topic of parking and asked for input from the <br /> Commission. <br /> Chairperson Bauer asked for details on parking, using the example of Coborn's and the different <br /> businesses. <br /> Planning Manager Larson commented that is a great example of where shared parking signs are <br /> not helpful. He stated that in that case, the employees should be parking in further locations that <br /> are not often used to make parking more convenient for customers. <br /> Commissioner Van Scoy asked if vehicles that do not belong could be towed, using the example <br /> of a warehouse. <br /> Planning Manager Larson replied that it is private property and therefore unauthorized vehicles <br /> could be towed, but generally that is posted by sign. <br /> Chairperson Bauer provided an example where overflow parking from a church occurred in an <br /> area for an adjacent business and those vehicles were towed. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff stated that Mr. Kuker mentioned a concern with spillover from the <br /> dome could occur into his industrial properties and noted that is a situation where towing could <br /> occur. He stated that the language being discussed in this code would be shared parking similar <br /> to Coborn's where vehicles could not be towed in that same manner. <br /> Planning Manager Larson continued to review information related to parking. <br /> Commissioner Peters asked if there is a requirement for parking lot maintenance. <br /> Planning Manager Larson commented that is addressed under the property maintenance code. <br /> Planning Commission/January 26, 2023 <br /> Page 11 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.