My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/23/2023
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2023
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/23/2023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:19:33 AM
Creation date
2/17/2023 3:35:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
02/23/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Woestehoff referenced the concept of reserved parking and asked if stalls could <br /> be reserved for electric vehicles, should there be charging facilities in that location. <br /> Planning Manager Larson confirmed that could be done. <br /> Commissioner Van Scoy referenced the term "berth" which is mentioned for loading docks and <br /> asked if different language should be used. <br /> Planning Manager Larson stated that language already existed in code and confirmed that could <br /> be replaced with "designated loading zone". He provided details on landscaping and confirmed <br /> the consensus of the Commission on the proposed simplification to buffer zones. He reviewed the <br /> proposed changes to architectural standards. <br /> Commissioner Van Scoy stated that he would not see the necessity to screen loading docks from <br /> public right-of-way in an industrial area. <br /> Chairperson Bauer commented that the loading docks for Delta ModTech are visible from the <br /> residential area, and he does not see an issue with that. <br /> Commissioner Gengler stated that she would think of the sounds and activity of a loading dock, <br /> along with the visual impact, and therefore would support screening between loading docks and <br /> residential areas. <br /> Commissioner Hunt agreed that screening should be required when adjacent to a residential area <br /> but did not see the need to screen from a public right-of-way. <br /> Commissioner Anderson commented that he would also agree with buffering between loading <br /> docks and residential areas but could go either way. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff agreed that the City does not want to be a burden to a business <br /> development but would agree with screening between a loading dock and residential use. He stated <br /> that he would not necessarily think screening would be necessary for public right-of-way or in an <br /> industrial area. He asked and received confirmation that buffering/screening could simply move <br /> trees that would be required to be planted to be moved to the desired area. <br /> Commissioner Van Scoy referenced the parking lot screening mentioned and asked if a berm <br /> would be required. <br /> Planning Manager Larson replied that the screening could also be provided through landscaping. <br /> Commissioner Van Scoy did not believe that type of screening currently exists and whether there <br /> would be a need. <br /> Planning Manager Larson commented that it is helpful with mitigating traffic issues from lights <br /> shining, but the screening would also assist in mitigating the impact of a parking lot visually. <br /> Planning Commission/January 26, 2023 <br /> Page 12 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.