My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 09/19/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Public Works Committee
>
2000 - 2009
>
2000
>
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 09/19/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 10:00:46 AM
Creation date
5/22/2003 11:09:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
09/19/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case #5: Update of Mining and Grading Ordinance <br /> <br />City Engineer Olson stated that in 1999, the City had some difficulty enforcing the removal of a <br />berm along C.R. #116. Residents wanted to extend their lawns by the removal of soil that was <br />placed for the purposes of a berm. Also within the last few years there has been some issues <br />raised by residents regarding their yards to redirect the flow of storm water runoff. The City <br />Council directed staff to review the current policy regarding the removal or addition of soil to see <br />whether or not the mining and grading ordinance should be reconsidered. The current portion of <br />Chapter 9 in the City code that deals with these issues states that a conditional use permit shall be <br />applied for all grading, mining, and filling operations with the following exceptions: <br /> <br />· No additional permit shall be required if the grading, mining, and filling operations are being <br /> done as a part of a subdivision plat, site plan, or planned unit development. <br /> No permit shall be required if the grading, mining, and filling operations are being done by a <br /> public agency and is incidental to construction or maintenance of streets or utilities. <br />· No permit shall be required for grading of individual lots by less than 3 feet in depth, filling <br /> of less than two feet at any point and which does not interfere with surface drainage in the <br /> area. <br />· No permit shall be required for grading, mining, and filling operations that require removal of <br /> less than 400 cubic yards of earth material. <br /> <br />City Engineer Olson stated that City staff has solicited responses from 15 other communities <br />throughout the Twin Cities metropolitan area. Staff has received responses from 7 communities <br />of which 3 did not have restrictions or ordinances in place. Three of the remaining communities <br />are similar to the City of Ramsey in that they differentiate between commercial grading and <br />residential operations and require a permit if export of materials exceed 100 - 1000 cubic yards <br />of material. The last ordinance that staff received, submitted from the City of Savage, has a three <br />tier approach. No permit is required for any excavation that would export soils less than 25 cubic <br />yards. A minor excavation permit is required for export of soils greater than 25 cubic yards and <br />less than 2000 cubic yards. This permit requires the filing of an application, supplied by the City, <br />and the supply of a legal description of the property and copy of a section map showing the <br />proposed grading and export plan. Any operations that would require the export of soils greater <br />than 2000 cubic yards would qualify as a commercial operation and would require a special use <br />permit. One of the reasons that other communities do not have any ordinances that control <br />residential grading projects is that those operations are already controlled to a point. Any <br />operation that alters the drainage patterns in an area that creates damage to adjoining property <br />would be the responsibility of the property owner that has that work done. The City of Ramsey <br />also addresses that issue in the current policy as represented by the third exception as stated <br />above. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that the only reason the ordinance was adopted is because <br />sugar sand is very valuable and they had people that were mining the sand and selling it for profit <br />and then abandoning the project. He stated that he wants to go after the real issue and if they <br /> <br />Public Works Committee/September 19, 2000 <br /> Page 11 of 13 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.