Laserfiche WebLink
suggested drafting findings of fact and an agreement that will protect the City from having to <br />build caretaker homes in the future. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated that the Council could reaffirm in the findings of fact that they do <br />intend to enforce City Code allowing one home on one lot and the home was only constructed <br />due to certain circumstances. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman inquired if Council was satisfied with the turnaround concerns in <br />the cul-de-sac. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik stated that the Planning Commission was satisfied <br />since the road was identified as a dead-end. <br /> <br />Director of Public Works/Fire Chief Kapler stated that he is familiar with the cul-de-sac and is <br />comfortable with the situation. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec noted that he discussed the issue with the bus company and they stated that there <br />was only one person entering onto the bus on the street so there currently has been no reason to <br />drive down the road. If it was desired for the bus to drive down the road, they would be able to <br />accommodate. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich recommend adding item #5a to the findings of fact stating: "That the <br />City Council reaffirms the necessity of maintaining the City Code Section 9.11.01 providing that <br />there shall be no more than one main building on a lot as said section as important City Planning <br />and Zoning Regulations generally intended to benefit the health and welfare of the comments. <br />That because of this finding the City generally opposes granting variances to this requirement (of <br />City Code 9.11.0)." He also recommended adding item # 5b to the findings of fact stating: <br />"That because of the unique circumstances by which the second home was built on the subject <br />property, the Council deems it responsible to grant a Conditional Use Permit for the 2'~a home, <br />however, the Council may reject any attempt to use this Conditional Use Permit approval as a <br />precedent to avoid the requirements of section 9.11.01 in the future. <br /> <br />Councihnember Hendriksen stated that the wording "will be" in item #8 of the findings of facts <br />should be changed to "is", and item gl 0 should address the sale of the property requirements. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik stated that the issue is addressed in the CUP. If at any <br />time the home is not being used for a caretaker then the property owner would be required to <br />subdivide the property. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Connolly, seconded by Councilmember Hendriksen, to adopt <br />Resolution #00-01-036 adopting Findings of Fact #0509, as amended, relating to Mr. Kveton's <br />request for a conditional use permit for two dwellings on one parcel. <br /> <br />City Council/February 8, 2000 <br /> Page 9 of 15 <br /> <br /> <br />