My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 02/22/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2000
>
Minutes - Council - 02/22/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:56:49 PM
Creation date
5/22/2003 11:58:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/22/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
connection, and noted that he was glad they held the public hearing since that was not the case. <br />Based on his own assessment, he felt the extension to C.R #116 it would be a significant <br />improvement to the traffic in front of their homes, but if the residents in the area don't want the <br />extension then he will not vote in favor of it. Councilmember Hendriksen also noted that he <br />wants the residents to be real sure that they don't want the extension because once the area gets <br />developed there will be very little if anything that can be done to reduce the traffic within the <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />Ms. Hoffman replied that most residents feel that the traffic levels have been reduced to a <br />comfortable level and with the extension of the roadway, it will open traffic up to the <br />development, which could create more traffic. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen replied that there would be no destinations into the development that <br />would attract additional destinations. During the neighborhood meeting it was determined that <br />the additional cars that were added was a flawed analysis. The residents were only presented <br />with the worst case scenario. <br /> <br />Mike LaBlanc questioned what the Council would figure the general consensus of the <br />neighborhood was. He explained that some of residents are apprehensive to talk because the <br />meeting is live on Cable TV, but when C.R. #116 was extended, the traffic problems in their <br />neighborhood improved, but now the City is requesting them to connect to that road and create <br />more traffic again into their neighborhoods. <br /> <br />Councihnember Connolly stated that she would like to see what the impact of Elk River's <br />expansion to Armstrong Boulevard will have on the area. She explained that as traffic increases <br />along Armstrong Boulevard, making it more difficult for residents to take a left hand turn out of <br />the neighborhood, it will increase traffic back on 149th and 150'h. Councilmember Connolly <br />informed the residents that they are welcome to call the Councilmembers at home to discuss the <br />issue. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec noted that there will be an additional 1,800 homes being constructed in Elk River <br />that will have an impact on those County Roads. <br /> <br />Mr. LaBlanc replied that he is still opposed to extensions. <br /> <br />Councihnember Hendriksen questioned how many residents were from 149th and 150th. All <br />residents present were from 149th Avenue. <br /> <br />Ms. Hoffman stated that she thought the property north of C.R. #116 was private property and <br />questioned how the City can be making decisions regarding the land. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec replied that the City does not own the property and the plan is only a proposed <br />plan. <br /> <br />City Council/February 22, 2000 <br /> Page 10 of 27 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.