Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Elvig questioned if the City Administrator is comfortable with the proposed <br />budget at the 39.1985% tax capacity rate. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman responded in the affirmative. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec clarified the budget set at the 39.1985% tax capacity rate would eliminate the <br />following from the preliminary budget: one of the two police officers, one of the two public <br />works employees, the fire inspection employee, the communications employee, and a cut of <br />$4,500 in depreciation. <br /> <br />Councilmember Olson stated she agrees that the City needs to hold back with the budget and <br />stick with what the Council told the taxpayers they would work with. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook stated he felt a little different about this budget one month ago. However, <br />he has been asked to cut his budget almost in half every year lately, while this budget will still <br />add 4 ½ new employees of the 8 that were requested. He will have to support this budget. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen commented many entities have freezes in place, while the City of <br />Ramsey has still been able to grow. <br /> <br />The Council discussed building permits and projected revenue for housing in the City. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman advised the City will be able to contract services outside of regular <br />employees if needed for assistance with building permits. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Kapler stated it is a neat opportunity to be involved with a growing city. <br />He believes the level of service provided by the City is not static, and the expectation of the <br />community will be at a higher rate for services. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman advised the residents moving into the new housing in the City will <br />likely have a desire for a higher level of public services than the history of Ramsey has shown. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook noted the Council just authorized an organizational study at the last <br />Council meeting, and it behooves the Council to review the results of that study and determine <br />what can be done with the present staff before adding employees. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig stated looking at past studies, Coborns had an estimated value of $2.03 <br />million and the actual value came in at approximately $5 million. The NAU building will be the <br />same type of situation. A strong silver lining is that the estimates were conservative, and at this <br />time the values are 50% better than anticipated. Once development starts filling out it should <br />supercede the bell curve. <br /> <br />The consensus of the Council was to direct staff to proceed with the budget based on a 39.1985% <br />tax capacity rate. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated he will not be supporting this budget at the 39.1985% tax capacity rate. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / November 1, 2005 <br /> Page 5 of 7 <br /> <br /> <br />