My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 08/22/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2000
>
Minutes - Council - 08/22/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 2:03:16 PM
Creation date
5/22/2003 2:26:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/22/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Gamec replied that the applicant should work with the City Engineer, but would have to <br />begin grading at their own risk. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski reviewed the concerns of the WMO regarding drainage of the property. <br /> <br />Councihnember Hendriksen stated that he recalls the City doing a lot of pumping in that area in <br />wet years and he thinks that the City needs to be careful as to what they do for drainage of the <br />area. <br /> <br />Councilmember'Anderson inquired as to what other alternative drainage options there would be <br />for the site. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski replied that the City could pursue an outlet or try to identify down <br />stream where the water would go into an overflow. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen suggested completing a feasibility study for a storm drainage system <br />for the area. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec requested that staff put together some figures for the next meeting. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated that if the City is requiring the applicant to connect to a <br />frontage road, are they treating all of the applicants that have applied for a building permit <br />permits the same. He noted the City is now saying that when and if there is a frontage road they <br />will give up access and questioned if they are treating them the same as if City sewer and water <br />is available and requiring them to hook up. <br /> <br />Councihnember Hendriksen replied that he did not see those issues to be the same. <br /> <br />Councihnember Anderson suggested including the language regarding the frontage road in all <br />development agreements along Highway # 10. <br /> <br />Consensus of the Council was to discuss the issue further at a work session. <br /> <br />Case #6: <br /> <br />Request to Rezone Certain Property from R-1 Rural Residential to R-1 · <br />Urban Residential, Case of Reilley Estates Partnership, Inc. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik stated that Reilley Estates Partnership is requesting a <br />rezoning of property proposed to be platted into single family urban residential lots. The <br />property is approximately 75 acres in size. The Comprehensive Plan amendment initiated by <br />Ramsey in 1993, and approved by Met Council in 1995, placed the subject property in the <br />Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) for residential development with urban services. The <br />adjacent parcels to the north, east, west, and on the south side of 153rd Avenue NW are also in the <br />MUSA and zoned Rural Residential. The surrounding properties were developed prior to being <br /> <br />City Council/August 22, 2000 <br /> Page 12 of 18 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.