My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/14/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2006
>
Agenda - Council - 02/14/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 2:57:10 PM
Creation date
2/10/2006 1:25:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/14/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
363
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REPORT FROM PUBLIC WORKS <br /> By: Public Works Staff <br /> <br />Background: <br />The Public Works Committee met on Tuesday, January 17, 2006 and discussed the following <br />seven cases: <br /> <br />CITIZEN INPUT <br />Dan Murphy, 5600 150~ Lane in Pondvale Estates, stated there was trouble trying to get sewer <br />and water in his neighborhood in the past. However, there will be a new development where <br />the existing City Hall is currently located', and Helium Street will run up to Alpine Drive. The <br />extension of Helium Street was the big issue in getting the sewer and water to go thxough the <br />last time. He stated the City offered an excellent opportunity for the sewer and water last <br />time, but it did not work out. Mr. Murphy distributed a petition in favor of a sewer and water <br />project in Pondvale Estates. He stated the property owners of Lot 2 signed an agreement when <br />they purchased the house that requires them to remain neutral on any proposed City water and <br />sewer projects. He requested the City to look at this request again, possibly due to drainage or <br />road issues, and explained there will be another 11 to 13 lots opened in the area. Staff replied <br />in 1993 there was a feasibility study for sewer and water put together that was counter- <br />petitioned and the project was blocked. In 2001 the discussion was started at the Public Works <br />Committee, and the Council then directed staff to look into this area more regionally. At that <br />point three separate feasibility studies were drafted. There were counter-petitions and the <br />project has not been discussed since. Staff advised since the City has put significant funding in <br />the feasibility for both ceighborhoods, nothing of which was reimbursed, that the City would <br />not move forward with another project like this until there was a request and staff advises this <br />petition should be forwarded to the City Attorney to be sure it is correct as to form. Support <br />of more than 35% of the property owners is required by City Code to require a feasibility <br />study. <br /> <br /> Motion to accept the petition contingent on City Attorney review. <br /> <br />Action: <br /> <br />Ratify the recommendation of the Public Works Committee. <br /> <br />Case #1 Consider Establishing Process for Subdivision Street Lighting Requests <br /> <br />Background: <br />Periodically staff receives inquiries from the public on the process for getting street lights <br />installed in areas currently without them. Staff has advised such inquiries that a petition to the <br /> <br />-319- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.