My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/14/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2006
>
Agenda - Council - 02/14/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 2:57:10 PM
Creation date
2/10/2006 1:25:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/14/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
363
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
situations that put it in violation. He indicated he thinks they need to provide time to move, but <br />that is all. Chairperson Nixt stated he would love to keep the business in Ramsey, but it has to <br />move somewhere else. <br />Commissioner Brauer indicated he could agree to 90 days if they had some assurance that these <br />violations will not continue to occur during that time. <br /> · 1 , but that would <br />Chairperson Nixt stated he would be willing to give Mr. Guzzo until. March ~ st <br />be the longest amount of time. <br />Motion by Commissioner Brauer, seconded by Chairperson Nixt, to recommend that the City <br />Council adopt Findings of Fact relating to Robert Guzzo's request for an interim use permit, with <br />the following clarifications: <br /> 29. That the proposed use will adversely impact traffic in the area. <br /> 30. That the proposed use will not be compatible with the residential neighborhood due to <br /> density and lot size of the surrounding lots. <br /> 31. That the proposed use will be unduly dangerous or otherwise detrimental to persons residing <br /> or working in the vicinity of the use or to the public welfare. <br /> 32. That the proposed use will substantially adversely impair the use, enjoyment, or market <br /> value of any surrounding property. <br /> 33. That the proposed use will be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. <br /> 34. That the proposed use will not be served adequately by public facilities and services such as <br /> highways and streets. <br /> 35. That the proposed use will create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public <br /> facilities and services, and it will be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. <br /> 36. That the proposed use will involve activities and uses that will be detrimental to any <br /> persons, property, or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, <br /> smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. <br /> 37. That this is extension is granted to give the owner of the business adequate time to facilitate <br /> the transfer of his business to an appropriately zoned commercial facility. <br /> Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Brauer, Levine, Shepherd, Van <br /> Scoy, and Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Johnson. <br /> Motion by Commissioner Brauer, seconded by Levine to recommend that the City Council <br /> approve the request for an interim use permit based on the findings of fact, with the following <br /> correction: <br /> 1. That this resolution shall allow for a sign business to operate within a detached accessory <br /> building that is located on the Subject Property until March 31, 2006 while the owner facilitates <br /> the transfer of his business to an appropriately zoned commercial facility. <br /> Commissioner Van Scoy indicated that it sounds like there were several complaints made to the <br /> City, and asked what actions resulted. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/December 1, 2005 <br />Page 9 of 10 -35- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.