My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 11/14/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2000
>
Minutes - Council - 11/14/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 2:05:52 PM
Creation date
5/22/2003 3:05:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/14/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Attorney Goodrich noted that the rates and charges are separate from the credits and staff is <br />requesting that the rates and charges get established, that staff continue to look into the credit <br />process, and bring back a recommendation. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen replied that he thought the 20-acre minimum requirement was part <br />of the implementation policy. <br /> <br />City Engineer Olson explained that the 20-acre minimum requirement came up in July when the <br />Council approved the credit procedure, it is actually addressed as part of the resolution that is <br />added to the ordinance. <br /> <br />Councihnember Hendriksen stated that if it is addressed in the resolution he would like to revisit <br />that at some time. <br /> <br />Gray Gruber, Diamonds Sports Bar, stated that in the last month he has done a lot of research on <br />the stom~ drainage utility issue and City Engineer Olson is correct in stating that the rates are <br />slightly lower than other cities. The first city to implement such a utility was Shoreview, in <br />1991, and they have worked through a lot of bugs in the system. Some of those bugs included <br />the fact that they also had a storm water management charge that they did away with once the <br />utility fee was established. He stated that future businesses that come into the City and pay the <br />storm water management fee, may be upset to be paying both fees. The other issue is in most of <br />the other city's residential properties that were not all city lots were broken up into different <br />categories. In the City of Ramsey, there are many various lot sizes and he doesn't know if it is <br />something that can be reviewed. If he had a City lot and paid the same as someone that has 10 <br />acres, he would be upset. <br /> <br />City Engineer Olson replied that of the 12 cities that he reviewed, some had made the assumption <br />that a residential lot was one'fourth of an acre and others were one-fifth of an acre. <br /> <br />Mr. Gruber replied that most of those cities do not have the numerous number of different lot <br />sizes. <br /> <br />City Engineer Olson replied' that he agreed, but explained that someone with ten acres could still <br />have the same impervious area and would have a lot more area for the water to soak into the <br />ground. <br /> <br />Mr. Gruber also noted that some of the other cities, such as Bloomington and Shoreview, have a <br />50 percent credit procedure, but are going up to an 80 percent if they have completed a lot of <br />ponding. And many of the cities offered a six month grace period to get the credit information <br />and the credit was retroactive Also, in two of the other cities, if the development was less than <br />three years old, the blue prints were brought in and the site was developed as indicated on the <br />blue print, they did not have to hire another engineer to document the information. In going <br />through his research, he indicated he has found that they are not alone on this fee, but he thinks · <br />more work needs to be done. <br /> <br />City Council/November 14, 2000 <br /> Page 10 of 19 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.