My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/27/1988
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1988
>
Agenda - Council - 09/27/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2025 12:27:55 PM
Creation date
2/24/2006 9:46:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/27/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Disadvantages: <br /> <br />1. Matching existing poles adds to fixture costs and <br /> eliminates competition. <br /> <br />2. Poles in the center of the parking lot require cutting <br /> and patching asphalt. <br /> <br />Cost Estimate: $ 15,235.00 <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />Cost Estimate: <br /> <br /> Option No. 2 <br /> <br />Option No. 2 is similar to Option No. 1 except that the front <br />parking lot is lighted by parimeter posts as shown on scheme B <br />drawing. <br /> <br />Advantages: <br /> <br />1. All conduit can be trenched in ground and no asphalt <br /> should need to be patched. <br /> <br />Disadvantages: <br /> <br /> This layout will spill light over Property line up to <br /> several ft. candles. <br /> <br /> Matching existing poles adds to cost and reduces <br /> competition. <br /> <br /> This layout adds 2 additional poles. <br /> <br /> $ 18,600.00 <br /> <br />Option No. 3 <br /> <br />Same as Option No. 1 with competitive square type head on a <br />similar pole. <br /> <br />Added Advantage: <br /> <br />1. Less expensive fixture and offers competition. <br /> <br />Cost Estimate: $ 13,735.00 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.