My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/27/1988
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1988
>
Agenda - Council - 09/27/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2025 12:27:55 PM
Creation date
2/24/2006 9:46:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/27/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-5- <br /> <br />market(s) and the city of Ramsay would make a final decision on <br />the agent and carrier. <br />However, as I expected, all bidders cited the League as their <br />preferred market. Ordinarily this problem is overcome by one of <br />two methods: 1. markets are allocated by the amount of business <br />currently transacted between agent and insurer, or, 2. the <br />current agent is allowed to approach its current carrier and <br />other competitors approach other markets. <br />Either approach is usually acceptable, but I believe it is <br />problematic here for one big reason. Due to the relatively <br />uncompetitive nature of the municipal insurance market, the <br /> agent that is selected to approach the League is almost de facto <br /> the agent of record. Since the implicit (perhaps explicit) <br /> purpose of this process was to evaluate agents more so than the <br /> markets, there could certainly be outside concern about this <br /> step in the process. <br /> I therefore propose that the city alter the process somewhat and <br /> simply select the agent based upon these proposals, allowing the <br /> single agent of record to approach his market (which will almost <br /> invariably be the League). If this suggestion is taken, this <br /> section of their proposals would clearly have to favor FBS and <br /> TCF due to premium volume and prior affiliatlon- <br /> <br />Can the Following Service be HA FBS TCF <br />Provided by Your Markets? ........ <br />1. Safety Reviews? Yes Yes Yes <br />2. physical Inspections? Yes Yes Yes <br />3. Certificates of Insurance? Yes Yes Yes <br />4. Documentation for Rate Increases? Yes Yes Yes <br />5. Quarterly Loss Reports? Yes Yes Yes <br />6. Claims Handling, Auditing Yes Yes Yes <br />and certificates of insurance <br />7. New Construction Rate Consultation? Yes Yes Yes <br />8. Ramsey participation in own defense? Yes Yes Yes <br /> <br />Evaluation: <br /> Each agent's markets <br /> <br />can provide all services ~equested. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.