My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 07/28/1981
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1981
>
Agenda - Council - 07/28/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 1:39:18 PM
Creation date
2/28/2006 9:13:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/28/1981
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
357
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
($1 for aid year 1981). An average equalized mill rate of over 10 but less <br />than or equal to 20 mills qualifies for the next level of minimum per capita <br />aid increase ($4 for aid year 1981). An average equalized mill rate in excess <br />of 20 mills qualifies for the highest per capita aid increase ($6 for aid year <br />1981). This is somewhat similar to the old formula which apportioned aid <br />according to a city or town's aid distribution factor, which was its average <br />equalized mill rate multipled times its population. Under the old formula, <br />the higher the city or town's average equalized mill rate and the higher its <br />population, the greater its share of the Local Government Aid distributed to <br />the entire county. The minimum state aid factor tends to perpetuate this <br />relationship. <br />3) Since the relative distribution of Local Government Aid under the new <br />formula compared to the old formula changes very little, several of the <br />"inequities" of the old formula are perpetuated under the new formula. <br />Disproportionate allocations of Local Government Aid to cities outside the <br />metro area compared to similar cities within the metro area (defined as the <br />counties of Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott and <br />Washington), resulting from the county by county distribution of Local <br />Government Aid under the old formula, are locked into the distributions <br />under the new formula because of the "grandfather" provision. An inadequate <br />relationship between "fiscal capacity" and state aid under the old formula, <br />whereby tax base -poor communities were shortchanged, is perpetuated under <br />the new formula since so few cities or towns receive their Local Government <br />Aid increases on the basis of their preliminary state aid factors. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.