My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/25/1980
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1980
>
Agenda - Council - 11/25/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:08:01 PM
Creation date
2/28/2006 11:35:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/25/1980
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
309
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- 5 - <br /> <br />Although abatement programs, such as recycling and recource'recovery, will <br />never completely eliminate the need for landfills, the Region could sub- <br />stantially abate the amount of waste that has to be landfilled in the <br />future. According to Council estimateS, 12 to 15 percent of all solid <br />waste generated in the Metropolitan Area by the year 2000 could be <br />recycled. Most of these recyclable wastes would consist of paper (includ- <br />ing corrugated cardboard) and residential yard waste (leaves and grass <br />clippings) that could be composted on a small scale. The remainder of <br />these recyclable items are expected to be made up of glass, ferrous <br />materials and nonferrous metals, like aluminum. <br /> About 56 - 75 percent of the year-2000 total could be handled by high- <br /> technology resource recovery systsm~, like furnaces that incinerate wastes <br /> to produce heat energy. The remalnlng wastes--10-32 percent--would have <br /> to be put in landfills. <br />As the numbers show, the lion's share of future wastes is expected to be <br />handled by high-technology resource recovery systems, such as trash- <br />~burning furnaces and biological recovery plants. <br /> Typically, such systems use large-scale, expensive equipment; they need a <br /> large, reliable supply of trash, entail substantial financial risks, and <br /> require long planning lead times. <br /> Waste separation, on the other hand, involves fewer financial risks and <br /> less costl~ equ%pment. ~onsequently, the Metropolitan Area can expect to <br /> see communlty-w~de recycling programs sooner than the more elaborate, <br /> costly resource recovery systems. <br /> The report recommends several steps to foster recycling, including: <br /> - Formation of an intergovernmental committee to promote use of existing <br /> and new recycling centerS, in cooperation with private industry. <br /> <br /> - Management and training programs dealing with operation of recycling <br /> centers. <br /> <br /> - In-office paper conservation and recycling programs. <br /> <br /> - Increasing the percentage of recycled and recyclable materials used by <br /> government and private industry. <br /> <br /> - Separation and salvaging of materials at transfer stations and land- <br /> fills, when possible. <br /> <br /> - Model source separation ordinances for use by cities and counties. <br /> <br /> - Local planning for curb-side pickup of recyclable materials. <br /> Several other recycling possibilities need to be investigated further. <br /> These include: <br /> <br /> - Satellite recycling centers that would make it more convenient for <br /> people to drop off their glass, paper and scrap metal. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.