My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/25/1980
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1980
>
Agenda - Council - 11/25/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:08:01 PM
Creation date
2/28/2006 11:35:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/25/1980
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
309
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- 17 - <br /> <br />The separation programs with the greatest potential waste stream <br />impact are curb-side pickup of recyclables, yard waste composting <br />and mechanical separation of metals. Mandatory programs will have <br />greater potential for recovery but will.require county, city and <br />township elected officials to adopt ordlnances. <br />Centralized yard waste composting systems are readily implement- <br />able but require additional capital for equipment, land and <br />publicity. Aggressive campaigns to increase back yard composting <br />may prove to be the most feasible short-term waste separation <br />strategy. Mechanical separation systems are expected to be <br />developed in conjunction with resource recovery facilities. <br />Because of the fragmented nature of the Region's present solid <br />waste management system, source separation programs will probably <br /> ~ ~ .... l~n,~ hv {ndlvidual counties, cities or ~rivate haulers and <br /> not on a region-wide basis. Notwithstanding, w~th approprla <br /> technical assistance from MPCA and the Metropolitan Council and <br /> through implementation of the counties' solid waste master plans, <br /> source separation programs can be increased to play a more signifi- <br /> cant role in reducing our dependence on landfills. (See Section V <br /> regional objectives for source separation goals.) <br /> <br />WASTE PROCESSING <br />Waste processing, for purposes of this report, is defined as volume <br />reduction techniques that are employed prior to landfilling, with or <br />without materials recovery systems. <br /> <br />SHREDDING <br />Shredding is a solid waste volume reduction technique that con- <br />sists of milling the wastes to reduce waste constituents to <br />smaller, more uniformly sized particles. <br />A shredding operation normally consists of a shredding unit, a ' <br />transport network and the shredfill (landfill accepting shredded <br />wastes). Several types of shredding devices are used, including <br />vertical and horizontal axis hammer mills, vertical axis grinders <br />and horizontal axis impactors. These shredders also usually <br />include a variety of conveyors for waste routing scales, truck <br />loading and .unloading platforms and storage bins or areas. <br /> In the shredding process, solid wastes are milled to produce uni- <br /> form particle sizes on the order of two to four inches in diam- <br /> eter. Waste size reduction results in up to 30 percent greater <br /> in-place waste density at the shredfill site. On a site-specific <br /> basis, daily cover may not be required, since litter and pathogen <br /> problems are reduced. Decreased settlement and improved operation <br /> during cold and wet weather have also been noted. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.