My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/25/1980
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1980
>
Agenda - Council - 11/25/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:08:01 PM
Creation date
2/28/2006 11:35:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/25/1980
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
309
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- 18 - <br /> <br />2. BALING <br /> <br />Baling is a solid waste volume reduction technique that consists <br />of compacting solid wastes into high-density (approximately 1,800 <br />lbs. per cubic yard), rectangular-shaped bales. <br /> <br />An on-site solid waste balin9 operation includes a baling plant <br />and a specially designed balefill (landf~ll acceptin9 baled <br />wastes). Alternatively, the baling plant may be located at a <br />large-quantity source of solid waste or at a waste collection and <br />collection point. <br /> <br />The basic advantages of the process increases are reductions in <br />required landfill volume, ease of waste transport and placement, <br />litter reduction, decreased settlement and reduced requirements <br />for cover material. A potential disadvantage is that the com- <br />pacting process slows the decomposition process, thus potentially <br />extending the period of time during which the landfill will con- <br />tinue to generate gas and leachate. Accordingly, the conditions <br />that favor this alternative are in areas in which there is a short- <br />age of landfill sites, thus requiring maximum utilization of <br />available land. <br /> <br />There is currently a study underway by the EPA to determine the <br />relative environmental advantages of balefill sites over conven- <br />tional landfills. This information is not available in final form <br />at this time. <br /> <br />3. CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />Research on shredding technologies bas increased in the past few <br />years. Preliminary indications are that shredding is a viable <br />means of reducing landfill space requirements through volume reduc- <br />tion and elimination of cover requirements. Based on increased <br />density.alone, w~t~out considering potential materials recovery, <br />shredding has the potential to significantly reduce Landfill space <br />needed. <br /> <br />Results from environmental studies on relative impacts of Dale- <br />fills versus conventional landfills are not as conclusive as <br />shredding research. Until more environmental data is available, <br />it would be premature to recommend a baling system ~or the <br />Metropolitan Area as a means to reduce added landfill needs. <br /> <br />D. RESOURCE RECOVERY <br /> <br />The types of resource recovery methods discussed in this section <br />include recovery of heat energy, biological treatment and recovery, <br />and tree waste recovery. Even though waste separation involves the <br />recovery of reusable waste materials, "resource recovery," as used in' <br />this report, refers to those strategies that recover resources through <br />various high-technology processing methods--for example, lncineration <br />or biological treatment. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.