My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/25/1980
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1980
>
Agenda - Council - 11/25/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 2:08:01 PM
Creation date
2/28/2006 11:35:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/25/1980
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
309
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- 25 - <br /> <br />An alternative to the open hauling system is an organized collection <br />system. In such a system, routes are established to serve all <br />residential units in a specific area on the same day. An objective of <br />such an approach is to reduce the length of the collection route Dy <br />reducing the distance between consecutive stops. A second oD3ective <br />is to reduce the number of trucks that travel through each residential <br />neighborhood each week. Shortening the distance between consecutive <br />cbllection stops would help improve collection crew productlvity. <br />Based on a recent analysis for the cost factors associated with such a <br />system, the City of St. Paul found that an organized collectlon system <br />may reduce collection and disposal costs. <br /> <br />An organized collection system could greatly facilitate the posslbili- <br />ties for recycling and resource recovery. Currently, a major drawback <br />to implementing recycling programs and resource recovery is the lack <br />of control over the collection of the waste. Under an organized col- <br />lection system, a community could work directly with the hauler or <br />haulers in implementng such programs. For example, recycling dis- <br />tricts could be established in a community and awarded to haulers <br />under a competitive bidding process. Another arrangement under the <br />system might involve passing the savings back to the community's <br />general fund to finance recycling activities and programs. An organ- <br />ized collection system could also facilitate control over the final <br />destination of the collected waste and, thus, provide for the large <br />waste supply guarantee necessary to assure the viability of large <br />central solid waste energy recovery facilities. <br /> <br />In cities where an organized collection system has replaced open <br />hauling, the city has generally either negotiated or solicited bids <br />from waste haulers to provide collection services for specific <br />districts within the city or for the entire city. The solicitation <br />generally specifies the level of service to be provided and the neces- <br />sary performance guarantees. The contractual period may be three to <br />five years, w~th escalation clauses tied to the Consumer Price Index <br />and Presidential guidelines. The clty's responsibility may include <br />handling delinquent accounts and enforcing municipal solid waste ordi- <br />nances. The city may also be responsible for billing and receiving <br />payments for sol~d waste collection services. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.