Laserfiche WebLink
- 31- <br /> <br />2. WASTE SEPARATION <br /> <br />Waste separation program costs will vary according to the type of <br />system (that is, recycling centers, source separation with curb- <br />side pickup, picking or mechanical separation), materials handled, <br />population densities and quality of program administration. <br /> <br />Results from recycling centers where data is available indicate <br />that a range of net savings from $10 per ton to a net cost of $10 <br />per ton is possible (MPCA, unpub, data). This data assumes that <br />all the recycling centers analyzed were operated as a profit- <br />making business. In other words, volunteer labor was calculated <br />at minimum-wage labor costs. When calculated without this assump- <br />tion, considering only paid labor and not including volunteers, <br />the program costs range from no net cost to $25 per ton savings <br />from revenues. <br /> <br />Table 2 represents a typical breakdown of capital investment <br />costs, by type of equipment, for various community source separa- <br />tion programs. The data is summarized from an EPA report. These <br />figures show a wide variation in costs, depending on items used in <br />a source separation program. <br /> <br />Curb-side source separation programs have a wider range of costs, <br />from $10 per ton costs to $77 per ton savings (Boca Raton news- <br />paper collection program). The Boca Raton program may not be rep- <br />resentative because of its near ideal market conditions. (A High- <br />capacity newsprint mill is located in Georgia.) Nonetheless, most <br />curD-side programs do break even in terms of materials revenues <br />and transportation and disposal cost savings, at least for meeting <br />the program costs. <br /> <br />The cost of curb-side leaf collection and centralized composting <br />through the windrow method can vary between $4.75 and $7.35 per <br />ton (MPCA, 1980). Of course, if backyard composting is used as a <br />community's preferred program, the only cost incurred will be from <br />public education materials and staff time. <br /> <br />In-offlce paper recycling programs are generally recognized to <br />have the potential for net savings to any agency or business with <br />at least 200 employees, depending on the type of organization. <br />Since the paper markets will supply most of the necessary employee <br />education literature, including desk-top recycling files, and <br />conduct the first "how to" instruction seminars, the only costs to' <br />the organization are usually the price of centralized containers <br />where the employees dump their desk-top recycling files, and start- <br />up staff time. The savings from reduced mixed-waste collection <br />costs and revenues usually exceed the minimal capital and oper- <br />ating costs. Essentially, once this type of program begins, it <br />runs itself with only a minimum of monitoring and occasional <br />employee reminders. <br /> <br /> <br />