Laserfiche WebLink
- 38- <br /> <br />3. CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />MOSt Of the financing methods discussed are for large-scale pro- <br />jects, probably to be developed at the county level or in some of <br />the larger municipalities. Moreover, such projects involve some <br />financial risk. At a time when the public is wary of spending <br />large amounts of money on new projects, expenditures could be more <br />difficult to approve. For this reason, it seems that some of the <br />financin9 approaches might be more feasible when combined with <br />private industry financial participation. One technique for <br />involving the business and industrial sector is through a set of <br />incentives. This is the subject of the next section. <br /> <br />D. ECONOMIC INCENTIVES <br /> <br />This section discusses two different aspects of financial incentives <br />that may encourage private sector participation in abatement pro- <br />grams. There are incentivgs provided by state and federal sources and <br />those the county or city can to exercise. Some of these may be viewed <br />as disincentives for not pursuing abatement practices. <br /> <br />1. AVAILABLE INCENTIVES <br /> <br />a. State and Federal <br /> <br />The State of Minnesota offers a five-percent pollution control <br />credit to eligible individuals or local governments. The <br />credit can be used on purchase of sites, construction, equip- <br />ment purchase, etc. There is also available a 10-percent fed- <br />eral tax credit on any new recycling equipment on similar <br />terms to the state credit. The federal government also pro- <br />rides exemptions from real estate taxes on sites where a <br />facility is engaged in any kind of pollution control opera- <br />tion. The loans mentioned in the preceding section might also <br />be considered incentives because they make it less costly for <br />a business to undertake abatement projects. <br /> <br />b. County and Municipal <br /> <br />Where haulers contract with the city to transport waste or the <br />city does its own hauling, it may be possible to work out an <br />arrangement whereby charges to haulers who recycle would be <br />lessened. Similarly, counties or cities could charge haulers <br />a~ extra fee to use landfills, with the revenue raised by the <br />surcharge going to recycling centers. Also, low-interest <br />loans could be provided to haulers for modifying trucks for <br />separated wastes. Low-interest loans could also be made avail- <br />able to individuals operating waste reduction and recovery <br />projects. <br /> <br /> <br />