Laserfiche WebLink
- 39 <br /> <br />POTENTIAL INCENTIVES <br /> <br />Discussed in this section are potential strategies that could pro- <br />vide incentives for business participation in abatement projects. <br /> <br />a. State and Federal <br /> <br />The state and federal governments have the authority to estab- <br />lish several possible incentives. They could impose a tax on <br />products that reflect the real costs of packages, the hauling <br />and landfilling cost included. They might also change some of <br />the existing laws that currently favor the production, trans- <br />portation and marketing of virgin material goods. The MPCA is <br />looking now at establishing a state investment tax credit <br />(like the 10-percent federal credit) that would then raise the <br />total credit to 20 percent for new recycling equipment. Some <br />other potential legislative options include allowing counties <br />tO use the property tax assessment process to provide incen- <br />tives to individuals, perhaps a lowering of the tax for th~se <br />who actively recycle. Exemptions from sales tax for business <br />firms that participate in recycling or resource recovery are <br />another possibility. At the federal level, it may be possible <br />to establish a set of income tax credits for individuals who <br />carry out source separation. Another possibility, needing <br />further study, is market subsidies; that is, guaranteeing the <br />market through a multitiered 9overnment purchase system until <br />prices are stabilized. <br /> <br />County and Municipal <br /> <br />The MPCA has suggested a model ordinance that, along with <br />other enforcement strategies, recommends a recycler's rebate. <br />The ordinance would allocate to recyclers the money haulers <br />save by dropping off recycled materials, instead of making <br />trips to the landfill. Such an arrangement assumes that the <br />haulers are under contract with the city and are not already <br />making all of the trips to the recyclers. <br /> <br />Another potential method involves organized collection of <br />source-separated items. Since the individual now pays a cer- <br />tain fee for garbage to be hauled, why not pay that same fee <br />to a hauler for picking up source-separated goods? Such a <br />system would require that some organization of collection and <br />billing be established among haulers and'the municipality or <br />county. <br /> <br />Also, it might be possible (with an organized collection sys- <br />tem) to establish a program like SORT (Separate Our Recy- <br />clables from Trash), which operates in Seattle, Washington. <br />This would involve a user-based fee on collection where those <br />with fewer bags or cans Of garbage would pay less (Mulligan,. <br />1979). <br /> <br /> <br />