Agenda - Council - 10/28/1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Comments: The unit assessment here that would have to be absorbed by the City if this is deleted is $1,830. As stated above, you would have to reassess the whole project for this cost. If you delete this particular assessment we had better adopt a City policy on this situation so that it is covered in the future. Council Action: Your action will be the same as outlined in sub paragraph (a) above. c) Mr. Ralph Karlson Plat 89215 Parcel 8010 (Construction Project #80 -10) - Enclosure (D2 -j) contains the finding of fact on this case. It also contains the proposed resolution if the assessment is deleted from the assessment rolls. Comments: The unit assessment that would have to be absorbed by the City if this is deleted from the assessment rolls is $1,996.43. As stated above, you can reassess this cost out to the whole project #80 -10. Council Action: Your action here will be the same as outlined above in sub paragraph (a). d) Mr. Harold Hanson Plat 89201 Parcel 1260 (Construction Project #80 -12) - Enclosure (D2 -k) contains the finding of fact on this case. It also contains the proposed resolution if the assessment is deleted from the assessment rolls. Comments: The unit assessment that would have to be abosrbed by the City if this is deleted from the assessment rolls is $2,196.49. Council Action: Your action here will be the same as outlined above in sub paragraph (a). e) Mr. Bernard Steinlag Lots 1 and 2 Block 5 Riverwood Hills Plat #1 (Construction Project #80 -14) - Enclosure (D2 -h) con- tains the finding of fact on this case. It also contains a copy of the proposed resolution if the assessment is deleted from the assessment rolls. Comments: The unit assessment that would have to be absorbed by the City if this is deleted from the assessment rolls is $1,538.85. Council Action: Your action will be the same as in sub paragraph (a) above.