My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 03/21/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2000 - 2009
>
2006
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 03/21/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 2:31:42 PM
Creation date
3/20/2006 6:30:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
03/21/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. Public Property. Regardless of the roadway classification, public property will be assessed in <br />accordance with the above residential street policy for low -density residential lots. The <br />assessment will be allocated on an equivalent front foot basis over the entire frontage. For <br />the purpose of this policy, the equivalent front foot will be determined by dividing the <br />frontage by the average residential lot frontage within the construction area. <br />B. Estate Development Streets Outside the MUSA <br />Street, Curb and Gutter Repairs <br />Rural Estate Residential Lots <br />a. For major maintenance NOT involving total reconstruction of streets 32 feet or less <br />in width, 33% percent of the project cost will be assessed to the area benefited on a <br />per residential lot basis. For purpose of this assessment policy the benefited <br />residential lots will be residential lots having front yard frontages along the <br />roadways being maintained. <br />b. For major maintenance involving a total reconstruction of streets 32 feet or less in <br />width including total curb replacement, 10% percent of the project cost will be <br />assessed to the area benefited on a per residential lot basis. For purpose of this <br />assessment policy the benefited residential lots will be residential lots having front <br />yard frontages along the roadways being maintained. <br />C. For major maintenance of streets wider than32 feet, the per residential lot cost will <br />be based on the average project cost ofmajor maintenance fora 32 feet wide street <br />within the municipal urban service area and 28 feet wide street in the rural/estate <br />areas. <br />d. Vacant Lots. Vacant and unplatted residential properties having frontage on the <br />streets having major maintenance performed will be assessed based upon the <br />number of potential lots into which the property could be subdivided. Forpurposes <br />of this policy, the number of potential lots will be determined by the smallest lot <br />allowed by zoning ordinances within the area of the improvements. <br />2. Urban/Low-Density Residential Lots <br />a. For major maintenance of streets 32 feet or less in width, 33 percent of the project <br />cost will be assessed to the area benefited on a per residential lot basis. For purpose <br />of this assessment policy the benefited residential lots will be residential lots having <br />front yard frontages along the roadways being maintained. <br />b. For major maintenance of streets wider than 32 feet, the per residential lot cost will <br />be based on the average project cost of major maintenance for a 32 feet wide street <br />within the municipal urban service area and 28 feet wide street in the rural/estate <br />areas. <br />C. Vacant Lots. Vacant and unplatted residential properties having frontage on the <br />streets having major maintenance performed will be assessed based upon the <br />number of potential lots into which the property could be subdivided. For purposes <br />of this policy, the number of potential lots will be determined by the smallest lot <br />allowed by zoning ordinances within the area of the improvements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.