My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 03/21/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2000 - 2009
>
2006
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 03/21/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 2:31:42 PM
Creation date
3/20/2006 6:30:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
03/21/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
typical for the City's predominant sandy soils. This area, however, contains clay soils and the <br />roadway exhibited signs of pavement failure shortly after construction. As a consequence the <br />City has patched these streets on an as needed basis and has never performed routine <br />maintenance knowing that reconstruction would ultimately be required. Consequently these <br />residents have never been assessed for the repair and maintenance that other City residents have <br />incurred. On the other hand, these residents have endured the generally poor condition of these <br />roads over this period. One element of this project would be to determine what portion of the <br />cost of the reconstruction shall be assessed to the residents. Mr. Jankowski advised a second <br />issue associated with this project relates to the close proximity that sanitary sewer and water will <br />be to this subdivision by the end of 2006. It would seem inappropriate to reconstruct these <br />roadways without the installation of urban services given the proximity of the proposed <br />Brookfield development and the indicated desire by many of the residents within Now and Then <br />Estates to subdivide their properties. The installation of urban utilities in this subdivision in turn <br />would require consensus on where future streets are to be installed. Finally, the activity <br />associated with the construction of the Brookfield development is likely to have an impact on the <br />streets in Now and Then Estates despite best efforts to limit traffic through this subdivision. It <br />may result in a better product if this reconstruction was implemented after a substantial portion <br />of the Brookfield Development has taken place. <br />There was considerable discussion of the following issues related to the reconstruction of <br />Dysprosium Street: <br />• A neighborhood meeting to determine the desire of the residents <br />• Possible road realignments in relation to the study of the rural reserve area <br />• Further information needed regarding the number of parcels with commitments to <br />Oakwood Land Development <br />• Anticipation of future roads to facilitate stubbing in sewer and water <br />• Determination on assessment amounts at full value or partial cost of the project <br />o City Engineer Jankowski advised the City has not completed any reconstructions <br />to date, and this project would set the policy. Overlays and sealcoats have been <br />assessed 50150. The decision regarding these assessments may be based upon the <br />project cost and how much is affordable. <br />o Acting Chairperson Cook suggested the establishment of a policy with a full <br />assessment when there is a petition for sewer and water and a reduced assessment <br />when the timeframe of the project is based on the City's schedule. <br />The consensus of the Committee was to direct staff to obtain further information regarding how <br />many of these properties will be redeveloped. It should be determined of the lots that will <br />remain, which property owners would like City sewer and water. Staff should also provide <br />information on a road reconstruction policy. <br />Public Works Director Kapler indicated this topic will be included on the agenda of the March <br />Public Works Committee meeting. Staff will survey other cities regarding their experiences with <br />this issue and provide that information as well. <br />Public Works Committee / February 21, 2006 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.