Agenda - Council - 01/27/1981 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

III.A. IV.A. Site Development Plan (to scale) - The points are reduced (25 to 20) and the method of awarding them has changed. To receive these points an application must contain a drawing showing the layout of proposed facilities. It must be done to scale. The level of sophistication of this drawing will not affect the evaluation as has been the case in the past. E. Design Relationships 1) Conflicts Between Recreation Uses - The number of points has increased from 15 to 20 and they will be awarded based on potential problems caused by poor relationships between recreation facilities and the possibility of solving these problems on the same site with a better design. Facility Design Criteria - The number of points has increased from 20 to 25. They will be awarded by comparing the sizes, orientation, etc. of facilities to accepted design standards and judging whether these standards could be met by modification to the design. 3) Effort needed to correct problems - This 10 point criterion has been eliminated by combining it with E1 and 2 above. Site Intrusions - no change in points or method of award. Maintenance - The number of points has increased from 15 to 20 and will be awarded differently. In the past, these points were awarded on structure of the park maintenance function in the applicant city. It was assumed that this better structure would lead to better maintenance. This assumption may or may not be true, i.e., different structures work better (or worse) in different communities. Therefore, staff will inquire about the maintenance staff, budget and experience of each applicant. A Judgment will then be made as to whether the applicant can do an adequate Job of maintaining the project if it is accomplished. Staff feels that the major concern here is spotting applicants that obviously can't take adequate care of the land or facilities involved in the project. If this case can be made, this criterion can be used to penalize the project by giving fewer or no points. If it can't be made, the applicant should receive full points, regardless of the structure of the maintenance function. Program - The number of points has decreased from 35 to 20 and will be awarded similarly to those for maintenance. Staff, budget and experience wilI be questioned and a general evaluation made. Particular attention will be paid to school district and other joint programming arrangements. Fiscal Effort - The number of points has increased from 30 to 35. They will be awarded similar to last year except that there will be a separate point spread (0 to 35) for each planning area. This will allow each area a chance at the maximum number of points, thereby accomplishing the desired overall weighting system.