Laserfiche WebLink
As a direct result of the efforts of Anoka County and because of the <br />apparent potential source of alternative fuel production in this metropolitan <br />area, Anoka County has received several letters of support from Federal, <br />State and local officials towards this effort. <br /> <br />At the time of this writing, the staff of the County Administration <br />Office is in the process of preparing a request for proposal for feasibility <br />studies from various engineering firms throughout the Country. It is <br />the plan of Anoka County to conduct an engineering feasibility study for <br />landfill gas recovery at the afore-referenced landfill during the Spring <br />of 1981. Depending on the results of this effort, the County plans to <br />solicit operational contracts for a landfill gas recovery and utilization <br />system during the Summer and Fall of 1981. <br /> <br />LANDFILL GAS RECOVERY - ALTERNATIVE CONSIDERATION FOR "RESOURCE RECOVERY" <br /> <br />The metropolitan counties of the Twin Cities area have for some years <br />now been involved in a major study effort relative to the future of <br />solid waste mana§ement, and more specifically, resource recovery systems <br />for the metropolitan area for the future.' The principal focus for <br />resource recovery planning efforts has centered around the technology of <br />shredding municipal solid waste into refuse derived fuel (RDF) and <br />utilizing the fuel in boilers for steam generation. <br /> <br />The RDF/steam generation technology has been utilized in numerous applications <br />around the Country to varying levels of success. The capital costs of <br />such facilities, depending on size, location and proximity to markets, <br />vary from 50 to 250 million dollars. According to the National Center <br />for Resource Recovery, the Sargus, Massachucetts steam generation facility <br />is the only one which is currently successful from an economic perspective. <br />This is made possible only because of a $13.00/ton drop charge and a <br />municipally owned power plant as .the single market. This compares to a <br />$5.00/ton average drop charge existing in the Twin Cities metro area. <br />Numerous technological problems exist in these .type of facilities and <br />given the extremely high capital costs, the systems dictate a very high <br />level of public'subsidy in the operational economic matrix. <br />Reiterating the purpose of this "white paper", the Anoka County Board of <br />Commissioners is calling for public consideration of landfill gas recovery <br />as a possible aternative or adjunct to any resource recovery system <br />which is developed in this Metropolitan area. Following the model of <br />the CID Landfill at Calumet, Illinois, servicing the Chicago area (see <br />Attachment "A"), it appears on the surface that a very viable alternative <br />to a major resource recovery effort might well be the establishment of a <br />large scale (300- 400 acres) sanitary landfill specifically designed and <br />constructed for the purpose of recovering and utilizing methane gas. <br /> If landfilling and gas extraction can in fact be considered as an alternative <br /> to "Resource Recovery" in the traditional definition of the term, it <br /> appears to the Anoka County Board that the Capital Costs are minimal in <br /> comparison with a much faster economic payback. <br /> <br />-5- <br /> <br /> <br />