Laserfiche WebLink
B. NOTE B0~h°J)SAND COMMISSIONS <br /> Personnel Committee meeting of March 6, 1981. <br />The council noted the Personnel Committee meeting of March 6, 1981 and made <br />no con~nents regarding the same. <br /> <br />C. LETTERS AND CON~NICATIONS <br /> The council noted the following !etters and communicationS and made so further <br /> comments: <br /> <br /> 1. Letter dated February 27, 1981 to 16201 Nowthen Blvd Re: <br /> On-Site Septic System Health Hazard <br /> 2. Letter dated February 27, 1981 to 17409 St. Francis Blvd Re: <br /> Health Hazard Septic System <br /> 3. Letter dated February 25, 1981 fromm Dept of Transportation Re: <br /> Proposed Ramsey Airport <br /> 4.Letter dated February 18, 1981 from Anoka County Re: Review of <br /> Anoka County Comprehensive Plan <br /> 5. Letter dated February 25, 1981 from ~noka County Joint Law <br /> Enforcement Council minutes <br /> 6. Letter dated February 25, 1981 from Metro Council Re: Plans and Specs <br /> for Anoka Interceptor <br /> 7. Letter dated Febraury 12, 1981 from Metro Waste Control Commission <br /> Re: Anoka Interceptor <br /> 8.Letter dated February 25, 1981 to Governor Quie Re: Legislative issues <br /> 9.Letter dated March 10, 1981 to Governor Quie Re: State Aid <br /> 9.A League of ~N Small Cities letter to State Legislators Re: State Aid <br /> 10.A Letter dated March 4, 1981 from Dennis Berg, Chairman B~rns Township <br /> Board, regarding approval of our comprehensive plan <br /> ll.A Letter fromMarilyn Gallagher dated March 4, 1981 re: Landfill <br /> $D2 cOUNCIL OIDBUSINESS: <br /> 1. Dennis Donovan, Park & Recreation Chairman, regarding proposed <br /> Bond Issue. <br /> Dennis Donovan talked about what the term committment meanS. The park board <br /> is concerned and must have the council support of the proposed project. The <br /> park board f~els the bond issue needs a committment from the council and the <br /> citizens should decide if they want to provide the services or not on the <br /> recreational facilities. He further stated the park board doesn't feel <br /> the 8% figure for the bond interest rate is realistic or an accurate reflection <br /> of cost to the citizen. He stated the Springstad agent says the 8-8.75% <br /> roximately $1.00 per year per household. Aiso the waiting effect <br /> difference is app · agent stated it is a volatile market, <br /> is questionable and that the Springstad <br /> and that a lO year 8.5% figure is within reality and could guarantee the <br /> inflation rate would be higher in the future. If the bond issue passes there <br /> is the possibility that once interest is accumulated,' the difference between <br /> 8% and 8.75% rate could be made up. Mr. Donovan suggested proceeding now <br /> in a committed fashion. <br /> C/March 10, 1981 <br /> 3 <br /> <br /> <br />