Laserfiche WebLink
METROPOLITAN couNCIL <br /> Suite 300 Metro Square Building, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 <br /> <br /> March 6, 1981 <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: Physical Development Committee <br />FROM: Environmental Planning (jaCk Frost) <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Anoka interceptor Plans and Specifications <br /> Metropolitan Council District No. 12 <br /> Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 6986-2 <br /> <br />iNTRODUCTION <br />The Metropolitan Waste Control Com~%ission (MWCC) has resubmltt~dw <br />plans and specifications for the Anoka Interceptor for our revle and <br />comment. <br /> <br />AUTHORIT~ FO___~R ~KEVIE~ <br /> The Metropolitan Reorganization Act (Minnesota Statutes 473.161) and <br /> the Council's Water Quality Management Plan Procedure 5 allow the <br /> - ~ - and s~ecificati°ns for <br /> Council to review and comment on t~e p~an~ ~ _ - -- <br /> conformance with the approved Development Program before or at the <br /> time the Capital improvement Budget is submitted for approval. <br /> DESCRIPTION OF T~E_ PROJEC~ <br /> The project consists of 11,100 lineal feet of intercepting sewers <br /> generally ranging in size from 30 inches to 48 inches. Also i~cluded <br /> is a pumping station and 9,800 lineal feet of 14 inch force main. <br /> This is as shown on the following figure and detailed in the plans <br /> and specifications entitled -intercepting Sanitary Sewer, Anoka, <br /> Minnesota; Project No. 77-07." <br /> · L~_- ~t will initially serve <br /> · · · · aced in opera~u ~ · <br /> hen this facility 17 p1 _ · · ...... made for connection to R~msey <br /> W . ~ ~v ~f AnoKa. ~rovlS~u~ ~ -. - ~ ~=msev- west o~ <br /> only ~ne ~--~ -- ~ =-- = ~ture connec~O~ ~ ~'~ ~' <br /> at Anoka's western Doru~&~ ' --- the Rum River to the <br /> Highway 47, and a future extension across <br /> existng Anoka northeast interceptor for future service to western <br /> Andover. <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br />The original plans and specifications were found technically <br />consistent with the approved Development Program by the Council at <br />its meeting of September 27, 1979. However, a procedural <br />inconsistency with the Development Program did exist. The <br /> Program required that Anoka participate in the cost Of <br /> Development . . · . The agreement between Anoka and ~he <br /> the hump stat~o~ and force maln__nized in the council approva? tha <br /> ~ ........ 1st. It was rec~9 ........ d how much eac~ par~y <br /> there were still queS=~un · Therefore, several <br /> should pay for the pump station and force main. <br /> alternative methods were indicated for paying for this work. <br /> <br /> <br />