My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/28/1981
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1981
>
Agenda - Council - 04/28/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 1:38:14 PM
Creation date
3/27/2006 11:29:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/28/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ADDENDUM TO COUNCIL NEW BUSINESS <br />CASE #10: PETITION FOR STREET IMPROVE FOR URANIMITE STREET N.W ., <br />.H., 1"101 d Vl Ivu ] ". i ' <br />A petition for street improvement has been received for the <br />above mentioned streets. However, in the middle of these <br />streets is Rhinestone Street and it was not covered in the <br />petition. We do, however, recommend including this street <br />in the total area. This petition covers 107 affected units <br />of which 48% signed in favor and 19% signed against. There <br />were also 33% of the affected property owners that were not <br />• contacted for one reason or another. <br />Council Action Council action will be to adopt Resolution <br />Declaring Adequacy of Petition and Calling for Report. <br />CASE #11: PETITION FOR STREET IMPROV - MENT FOR 152nd AVENUE N.W., 151st <br />AVENUE N.W. AND FLOURINE STREET N.W.: <br />A petition for street improvement has been received for the <br />above mentioned streets. There is a service road in this area <br />which is already blacktopped. I did not count any of the units <br />on the service road in figuring out the percentage of affected <br />property owners, however, it has been suggested to investigate <br />the possibility of upgrading the service road along with the <br />entire area. Not counting the service road there are 22 units <br />and of these 41% signed in favor. There was no provision made <br />• for signatures against on the petition. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.