Laserfiche WebLink
NAIOP <br />LEGISLATIVE <br /> REPORT <br /> <br /> NAIOP'S FIRST The House Local and Urban <br /> LEGISLATIVE Affairs Committee rejected Min- <br /> SEMINAR HUGE nesota House File 22 by a vote of <br /> 14 - 13 on Wednesday, April 8, <br /> SUCCESS 1981. This action, essentially in <br /> support of NAIOP's position on <br /> Industrial Revenue Bond financing, followed by three days <br /> NAIOP's First Legislative Seminar which was held at the <br /> Capitol Holiday Inn on Friday, April 3. Some 52 members of <br /> the Upper Midwest Chapter met with 8 legislators for several <br /> hours during a late morning open exchange and, afterwards, at <br /> lunch, legislative Committee Chairman, Jim Stuebner, re- <br /> ported that the seminar program will become the national <br /> NAIOP model for legislative interaction. As Larry Eastlund <br /> observed at our March seminar, the citizen can no longer rely <br /> only upon his party to represent his views in detail or his <br /> lobbyist to get the job done. In addition to both functions, the <br /> alert citizen must become involved in a grass roots effort to <br /> reach his legislators. Many state and federal representatives do <br /> not know how to vote on a given issue and welcome input <br /> from concerned Americans. <br /> In preparation for the noon panel, James Erickson, the Chap- <br /> ter's Minnesota Legislative Counsel, summarized the current <br /> status of the proposed bills affecting tax-exempt financing, <br /> tax increment financing and real estate taxes in general. He <br /> distributed a 48-page summary of all proposed bills pending <br /> before the following committees: Senate Local Government <br /> and Urban Affairs; House Local and Urban Affairs; House <br /> Select Committee on Bonding; Senate Government Opera- <br /> tions; Judiciary; House General Legislation; Senate Govern- <br /> ment Operations. <br /> Transcripts of ail hearings held are included verbatim. The com- <br /> pendium provides excellent resource material for the NAIOP <br /> member who wants to know exactly what has happened in <br /> the past several months. Some extra copies are available at <br />· Jim Erickson's office. <br /> <br />IRB FINANCING In spite of a personal and philo- <br /> sophical bias against tax-exempt <br />financing, Rep. William Schreiber acknowledged the need for <br />Minnesota to attract new industry and retain existing industry <br />against the competition of neighboring states. Rep. Tim Sher- <br />man spoke impassionately for IRB financing. His district at <br />Winona must compete against Wisconsin just across the Mis- <br />sissippi, and must at least match the tax-exempt financing <br />available in LaCrosse. He will support a no change position. <br />Minnesota need not add the elimination of tax-exempt finan- <br />lng to the list of serious problems confronting business and in- <br />dustry wishing to locate here. We cannot just talk about <br />Minnesota's quality of life. Pre must support that benefit with <br />economic advantages such as tax-exempt financing. <br /> <br />TAX INCREMENT Senator Marvin Hanson suppor- <br />FINANCING ted the tax increment device <br /> as the only way to overcome <br /> substantial problems relating to <br />specific areas. His committee does believe that it's a misuse of <br />the concept to apply it to large tracts of vacant land deing <br />developed as single subdivisions. The current objective is to <br />restrict such assistance to single sites upon which specific plans <br />for development are known before formation of the tax <br /> <br />increment district. <br /> <br />REAL <br />ESTATE <br />TAXES <br /> <br />In the face of Minnesota's pro- <br />jected deficit, tax relief is out <br />of the question. Therefore, Sen- <br />ator Douglas Johnson summar- <br />ized the attempt to eliminate <br /> <br />the inequities that resulted from the old "limited market <br />value" concept and the inbalance between residential and <br />commercial taxes. <br /> <br />At lunch, members were able to talk individually with the <br />attending legislators while the new NAIOP film strip illus-' <br />trated the differences between the old industrial neighborhood <br />and the new industrial and office park. <br /> - Jeff Coult, Secretary <br /> NAIOP legislative Committee <br /> <br /> PROGRAM <br />COMMITTEE <br /> NEWS MAY 8 <br /> <br />JUNE 16 <br /> <br /> JULY 21 <br />Many thanks to Bob Hoffman and Linda Fisher for their <br />excellent presentations at our April 21 breakfast meeting. AUG. 18 <br />We are most fortunate to have them share their experiences, <br />talents and insights with us. Those of you who heard the list <br />of speakers of Ken Stensby's Comprehensive Office Park SEPT. 15 <br />Course know that this will be another first-class NAIOP Na- <br />tional Seminar. As mentioned in our last newsletter, the Up- ocr. 20 <br />per Midwest Chapter will be host for the Comprehensive <br />Office Park Course kickoff dinner to be held on Monday NOV. 17 <br />evening, May 18, with Gerald Rauenhorst as the keynote <br />speaker. Upper Midwest Chapter NAIOP members who have <br />registered [or the Comprehensire O[fiee Park course do not DEC. 15 <br />need to register [or the evening dinner meeting or the break- <br />fast meeting on May 19. However, all other Upper Midwest <br />Chapter members must register for the kickoff dinner as well <br />as the breakfast meeting the following morning. <br /> <br /> UPCOMING EVENTS <br />NAIOP Comprehensive Course <br />Minneapolis, Minnesota <br />Financing Update <br />Breakfast Meeting <br />Half-Day Seminar <br />"Marketing & Product Changes" <br />"Is Minnesota Competitive?" <br /> Breakfast Meeting <br /> Office Market Update <br /> Breakfast Meeting <br /> (Topic Open) <br /> Breakfast Meeting <br /> Half-Day Seminar <br />"Business Forecast for 1982" <br /> Land Availability <br /> Breakfast Meeting <br /> <br /> - Dave Weir, Chairman <br />NAIOP Program Committee <br /> <br /> <br />