My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10/15/13
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Personnel Committee
>
Minutes
>
2013
>
10/15/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2025 3:36:36 PM
Creation date
5/12/2023 3:16:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Document Title
Personnel Committee
Document Date
10/15/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. COMMITTEE BUSINESS <br />4.01: Discussion Regarding 2014 Non -union Wages and City Health Insurance <br />Contributions <br />Human Resources Manager Lasher reviewed the staff report, noting the City has 68 employees, <br />of which 65 are benefit eligible. Of those 68, 24 are non -union and 44 are union. The purpose <br />of this case is to discuss non -union employee's wages and health insurance benefits for 2014 and <br />to consider a comparison related to the City's unionized employees. It was noted that since the <br />union contracts have been settled through 2014, the decisions made regarding the non -union <br />group will have an impact on the City's internal equity and compensation structure. She advised <br />that staff has data from about 18% of the reporting metro area cities indicating an average, non- <br />union wage increase of 2.08% for 2014. Human Resources Manager Lasher reviewed terms of <br />the 2014 settled contracts (wages and health insurance) (AFSCME, LELS-Patrol, and LELS- <br />Sergeants). She presented three options for the Committee's consideration and further <br />discussion: <br />Option #1: Retain the previously budgeted 2.5% increase in order to have flexibility based on the <br />results of further analysis and receipt of additional pending data and to offer the same health <br />insurance benefit to the non -union group as the unionized groups. <br />Option #2: Option #1 plus direct staff to perform a League of Minnesota Cities wage study for <br />each non -union position in order to gather position specific market data and then use the <br />remaining .5% to increase the position(s) that are too low. <br />Option #3: Based on discussion. <br />Human Resources Manager Lasher stated staff recommends Option #1, noting this will allow <br />flexibility and time to learn what the Consumer Price Index and market are doing. She noted that <br />in 2012, Department Heads received a 1% increase and all other staff members received a 2% <br />increase, causing an even greater disparity within the compensation structure and market. It was <br />noted the preliminary 2014 budget has accounted for a 2.5% non -union COLA and health <br />insurance increases. The difference between a 2% increase and a 2.5% increase is about $6,000 <br />per year. She stated there may be an issue coming forward relating to comparable market wages. <br />Councilmember Backous asked if a League of Minnesota Cities study is done each year and if it <br />has been done for 2014. <br />Human Resources Manager Lasher stated it is done yearly and already completed for 2013. <br />Councilmember Backous asked how the City rated and stated his preference to consider what the <br />market bears and compete for talent in that way. <br />Human Resources Manager Lasher stated the unionized groups are where they need to be. She <br />stated she has analyzed two-thirds of the non -union positions and found the City is at market or <br />below, but none are over market rate. <br />Personnel Committee / October 15, 2013 <br />Page 2 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.