My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10/15/13
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Personnel Committee
>
Minutes
>
2013
>
10/15/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2025 3:36:36 PM
Creation date
5/12/2023 3:16:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Document Title
Personnel Committee
Document Date
10/15/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Administrator Ulrich stated if the Personnel Committee wants to keep COLA low and <br />distribute funds to address market efficiencies, staff can present that option at a future meeting. <br />Councilmember Backous stated the market is the City's market and if the City is retaining <br />employees, it is doing a good job. He noted Ramsey is unique and not the same as other cities in <br />all aspects. He stated he has previously done salary surveys and they do identify if there are <br />major discrepancies. <br />Chairperson Tossey stated he has yet to see an employee leave because of a 1 % or 2% <br />discrepancy. He stated the non -union positions are generally the highest paid positions in the <br />City, and he believes this is not the time to consider a raise for the City's highest paid employees. <br />Chairperson Tossey supported taking the time to do a market analysis and then consider <br />adjustments, if justified, on a case -by -case basis. <br />Councilmember Kuzma asked who is considered non -union. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated it is department heads and confidential employees who work <br />with union negotiations such as Human Resources Manager Lasher. <br />Human Resources Manager Lasher stated, typically staff members who attend Council meetings <br />would be non -union as well as liaisons to Boards and Commissions. She described the positions <br />comprised in the union groups and stated she will provide a list that identifies non -union <br />positions. <br />Councilmember Kuzma stated support for a comparison study. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated if the unions get a percentage and the non -union do not, it will <br />be an issue. <br />Councilmember Backous stated the union is the union and those contracts were negotiated so he <br />does not find it to be a perception issue. <br />Chairperson Tossey stated handing out 2.5% increases to the City's highest paid employees <br />while asking residents to pay for roads is the perception issue he is concerned about. <br />Human Resources Manager Lasher stated it was clear that the Council wanted to focus on <br />retention and higher -level positions are specialized, leading the non -union groups. <br />Chairperson Tossey reviewed increases made within the Police Department and the issue of <br />whether salaries are equitable, which he is not buying, because the Council takes it up on a case - <br />by -case basis if there is a disparity. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated most non -union employees are exempt and do not qualify for <br />overtime and work extra hours. The union settlements were broken down into cost of living and <br />market rate adjustment. He stated staff will do additional research relating to market rates. <br />Personnel Committee / October 15, 2013 <br />Page 3 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.