Laserfiche WebLink
Prepared 6/19/81 <br />CITY OF RAMSEY <br />FINANCIAL ANALYSIS <br />An analysis of the City of Ramsey's financial trends and projections <br />has been prepared to guide the city in preparing its Capital <br />Improvement Program. The analysis shoWS whether there will be any <br />surplus operating revenue to finance future capital improvements and <br />it identifies the previous capital improvement financing resources <br />used by the City, and future debt repayment obligations. This <br />analysis also raises some important financial policy issues that the <br />city should consider such as the levy limitation, aid distribution <br />formula, and fiscal disparities tax base sharing formula. <br /> <br /> I. Population Growth Analysis_ <br /> For projection purposes, three alternative population growth <br /> assumptions have been developed, to evaluate the impact on <br /> revenue and expenditure projections. Figure 1 shows how these <br /> alternatives were developed. First, population growth from 1970 <br /> to 1980 was graphed. Ramsey's growth during this period was over <br /> 300%. The percentage increase is extremely high due to the small <br /> base population in 1970, so this percentage may not be used to <br /> project population growth. Furthermore, more than half of this <br /> growth occurred during the 1970-75 period, with the rate slowing <br /> somewhat from 1975-80. Compounded annually, the growth rate from <br /> 1975-80 averaged out to 7.4% per year, compared to 24% per year <br /> from 1970-75. <br /> The high population projections assume that the 7.4% per year <br /> population growth rate will continue. The low population <br /> projection is based upon the Metropolitan Council's projections <br /> for Ramsey, which if compounded annually works out to 3.2% per <br /> year. The medium projections at 5.3% per year, are simply the <br /> average between the high and low. <br /> II. OPERATING REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE PROJECTIONS <br /> The City's budgets over the past four years (1978-1981) have been <br /> analyzed to determine the growth trends in revenues and <br /> expenditures. This information is shown in Figures 2 and 3. The <br /> trends have been used to make operating revenue and expenditure <br /> projections for the next five year period to determine whether <br /> there will be any surplus current revenue to pay for capit'al <br /> improvements. Previous trends in capital improvement oriented <br /> revenues and expenditures provide a picture of how capital <br /> improvements have been financed in the past, the debt repayment <br /> obligations of the city, and future likely revenue sources for <br /> capital improvements. <br /> <br />9peratin~ Revenue. <br />Operating revenues have increased an average of 20.5% over <br />the past four years. Some of this increase is due to <br />inflation, and some is due to population growth in the <br />City. By far the City's largest source of operating revenue <br />is property taxes, which make up 74% of the 1981 operating <br /> <br /> <br />