My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/23/1981
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1981
>
Agenda - Council - 06/23/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 1:38:54 PM
Creation date
3/31/2006 7:47:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/23/1981
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
443
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
April 23, 1981 <br /> <br />The Honorable Thomas Gamec <br />Mayor, City of Ramsey <br />15153 Nowthen Blvd. N.W. <br />Ramsey, MN 55303 <br /> <br />Dear Mayor Gamec: <br /> <br />General blills, Inc. is of the understanding that a comprehensiye plan <br />is soon to be formally adopted by the City and forwarded to the <br />B~etropolitan Council. Accordingly, we have reviewed the proposed 1980 <br />Comprehensive Plan for the City of Ramsey and are writing you to express <br />a number of concerns that we have regarding the same insofar as it con- <br />corns the General Mills property. <br /> <br />As you are aware, the proposed Plan (Bk~p 10) indicates a 1990 zoning of <br />Low Density Residential for our entire parcel except for some 250 acres <br />shc~ as a prospective park. As this. land is the largest undeveloped <br />parcel held by one owner in the City of Ramsey, the opportunity of <br />developing it in order to achieve the highest and best use should not <br />be lost. By attaining highest and best use, the City's future tax base <br />will be enhanced and we feel that the City will be in a better position <br />to compete for the multiple types of development that will be enticing <br />to the private sector. Therefore, we would like to propose the foll~,'ing <br />which in our way of thinking, provides for no limitations on the options <br />necessary to reach highest and best use development on the aforesaid land <br /> <br /> 1. That portion lying southkest of the Bhrlington Northem Railroad <br />(in the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of To,reship 32, Range <br />25, totaling 7.1S acres). We would like to see the proposed zoning on <br />this parcel changed to B-l, Retail Business, making it compatible and <br />competitive with other properties along Highway 10. <br /> 2. That portion of the south half of Section 19 lying northeast of <br />the Burlington Northern Railroad. It is our feeling that the 1990 <br />proposed zoning for this area, approximately 114 acres, should be In- <br />dustrial. The Industrial classification would be are suitable and <br />consistent with the general area which is bordered by the Burlington <br />Northern and the proposed Intermediate Arterial Collector Road and is <br />included within the proposed Metropolitan Waste Control Comission <br />Service area. This would give the City more property which could be <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.