Laserfiche WebLink
Objectives <br /> <br />2. Ensure that waste facility capacities are consistent with <br /> regional solid waste management needs. Ensure that waste <br /> facilities are as efficient as possible. <br /> <br />Criteria <br /> <br />2a. Preference will be given by the Metropolitan Council to proposed <br /> waste facilities with capacities that are as efficient and <br /> economical as possible. <br /> <br />2b. The demand for secondary materials and/or energy should be <br /> sufficient to accommodate the supply of materials and/or energy <br /> from the proposed service area. Waste facility capacity should <br /> not exceed the market demand or the projected supply from the <br /> areas they serve. (For purposes of this criterion, demand should <br /> be defined as "the quantity of goods that buyers will take at a <br /> particular price." Indications of an intent to purchase and <br /> definition of a minimum price should accompany the application of <br /> a proposed facility.) <br /> <br /> 2c. The development of proposed solid waste management facilities <br /> should be compatible with the Region's growth forecastS, the need <br /> to replace existing facilities and county and Council schedules <br /> for implementing new waste facilities as req~i~ed by the Waste <br /> <br /> Management Act. <br />PROCESSING TECHNIQUES <br />Waste facilities provide <br /> <br />routine management of continually generated <br /> <br />solid or hazardous waste. These facilities must be reliable. They <br />must operate with minimum risk to energy and recovered materials <br />markets or to solid and hazardous waste generators and haulers. How- <br />ever, waste processing facilities have had recurring problems that <br />have led to increased costs and inconsistent service. Included have <br /> <br />been: <br /> <br /> o <br /> <br /> o <br /> o <br /> <br /> Damage to system components by the solid or hazardous waste, <br /> resulting in unscheduled shutdowns; <br /> Un~redicted wear resulting in frequegt replacement and <br /> maintenance of system components; an~ <br /> Failure to attain the same efficiency and reliability at a <br /> commercial scale that was achieved on a pilot scale. <br />Risk and reliability may be evaluated by considering the demonstrated <br />and commercial success of proposed solid or hazardous waste manage- <br />ment techniques. Such demonstrations should be under conditions of <br />similar facility scale, waste composition, waste supply area genera- <br />tion rates and proximity, and recovery product market needs. <br />with current technology, up to 60 percent of the energy value of <br />municipal solid waste and up to 70 percent of the waste's salvageable <br />materials can be recovered. <br /> <br /> <br />