My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/23/1981
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1981
>
Agenda - Council - 06/23/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 1:38:54 PM
Creation date
3/31/2006 7:47:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/23/1981
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
443
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7C. Assure with reasonable certainty that projected operating <br /> revenues, including those from the sale of recovery products and <br /> drop charges or user fees, will be adequate to pay all capital <br /> and operating costs associated with a facility underwritten by a <br /> governmental unit over the life of the facility. <br /> <br />Criteria <br /> <br />3a. Public facilities shall not create an unfair or unreasonable <br /> advantage or restraint of trade in ~-~elatio- ~ .......... <br /> · - .__ __ ., Lv ~u,~arao~e private <br /> ~a~lll~lesf. ~he Coupc~l sha~s~ ~-611owlng factors to <br /> ~etermlne the competitive 0peratlon of pub~i~ ~aste facl--i~-~s.%-- <br /> <br /> 1__~. The design and operatinq capacity of the waste facility; <br /> 2. The "tippinq fee" char~ed at the ~ate; <br /> <br /> 3__~. The g~ographic areas from which the waste facility will <br /> draw its waste; ' -- <br /> <br /> 4. The sources and mechanisms of fundin~ which will be <br /> -- util~r capital and op~-~a~-~nq expe--n-~u~-es; <br /> <br /> 5. The waste su 1¥ and refuse derived product market <br /> ~ontracts or commitments----~ an-~ <br /> <br /> 6. The economic requirements and viability of the <br /> competing private waste facility. <br /> <br />7b. The Metropolitan Council prefers private ownership and operation <br /> of waste facilities. <br /> <br />7Co <br /> <br />Preference will be given to waste facility proposals that are <br />designed to minimize property tax payment risk and to pass <br />economic benefits back to individual generators of solid waste. <br />In makin~ this determination, the Council shall consider amon~ <br />other elementS: ' <br /> <br />(7d. IN MAKING A DETERMINATION OF THE FINANCIAL SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF A <br /> WASTE FACILITY, THE COUNCIL SHALL CONSIDER, AMONG OTHER ELEMENTS:) <br /> <br /> o Total capital costs and the projected annual operation, <br /> administration, maintenance and debt service costs of <br /> the facility; <br /> <br />Amount, level and nature of projected revenues avail- <br />able for the payment of a facility cost over the life <br />of the facility; <br /> <br />Proposed method(s) of financing the facility; the <br />amount, type and provisions made for the security of <br />any public indebtedness incurred to finance the facil- <br />ity; the size of the tax base and other financial <br />resources backing any bonds to be issued to finance the <br />facility; <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.