Laserfiche WebLink
screened using columnar arborvitae. The existing site also has some overstory trees in the front. The trees will be <br />removed with construction and the applicant is intending to replant trees, though the species is not noted on the <br />plans. Additional arborvitae will be plated to continue the screening method currently used. Adequate topsoil <br />and groundcover need to be installed for all disturbed areas. <br />Lighting <br />The plans submitted show freestanding lighting in a portion of the yard. The applicant has stated that there will <br />be building -mounted lighting for the parking area. No cut sheets of the proposed fixtures were provided. All <br />fixtures must be downcast and shielded to prevent views of the light source from off site. This will be verified at <br />the time of building permit. <br />Utilities <br />The site is currently served by private utility systems that will be removed with the road project. A new well and <br />septic system will be installed near the new building. There are no municipal utilities available to the site nor will <br />they be extended with the road project. <br />Storm Water Management <br />The site currently has a basin at the northwest corner of the site that is collecting storm water. A storm pipe is <br />being added to help move storm water away from the parking lot. <br />Phasin <br />It should be noted that the project will be phased in as highway and frontage road construction occurs. The new <br />building will be constructed first with a driveway connection between the existing parking lot and the new parking <br />lot. Then, Ferrellgas will move into their new building followed by the old building being removed. As the <br />frontage road is constructed, access to the parking lot may alternate between the existing and the proposed <br />driveways. Once the frontage road is complete, access will be provided exclusively from the new driveway and <br />the old driveway and parking lot will be removed. The phasing is being done to minimize disruptions to the <br />site. <br />Funding Source: <br />The applicant is responsible for all costs associated with this review. The applicant is working with Anoka <br />County as part of the property acquisition process to cover their costs. <br />Recommendation: <br />Planning Commission Recommendation: The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the <br />proposal at its meeting on April 27, 2023. <br />Staff Recommendation: Recommend approval of Resolution #23-090 for a Site Plan Review for a building and <br />site improvements at 7255 Hwy 10 NW. <br />Other Alternatives: <br />1. Approval of the Site Plan Review with any modifications the Council would like. <br />2. Deny the Site Plan Review based on certain findings. <br />Action: <br />Motion to adopt Resolution #23-090 for a Site Plan Review for a building and site improvements at 7255 Hwy 10 <br />NW. <br />Attachments <br />Location Map <br />ACTION - Resolution #23-090 <br />Unresolved Changemarks <br />