Laserfiche WebLink
request for plans indicating future elimination of the temporary access. <br />C~.~.issioner De~mer stated that without that petition, the City will not get <br />the progress proposed 6 years ago with the original subdivision by DeZiel's, <br />K~var and Car~on. <br />~issioner ~.i~merman stated that blacktop shoul~ be required on the <br />t~l~rary ~ccess because ~ity Council will not force the issue and the <br />~porary sccess will ~e there a long time° <br /> City ~rney Goodrich ~rrived et this time° <br /> Om~iasioner zi~rman noted that there also needs to be ~ drainage plat for <br /> the plat~ sog~ested that · holdin~ pond could be created between io~ 3 and ~o <br /> Moron by (kmmiseioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Zi~erman stating <br /> that this Co~mission is agreeable to the plat concept of Mr o ~ichael Kovar but <br /> ~les preliminary plat approval until the regular Plannin~ and Zoning meeting <br /> in March, 1~85 for the followin~ reasons: <br /> 1. Lack of thoroughness of drainage plan. <br /> <br /> 2. Oo~ission desire to see a petition for a permanent service road to <br /> the rear of the property. <br /> Further, that if a petition for a permanent service road is not suk~itted <br /> along with the preliminary plat in March, the plat will not be approved. <br /> Further Discussion: C~dssioner Dee~er stated that if the petition fails, he <br /> can justify allowing front access off Hwy. %10 based on the fact that the <br /> developer did make an attenpt towards progress. Mr. L. Klersy inquired as to <br /> what procedure is used to initiate service road installation. Mr. Goodrich <br /> replied that street improv~ents are initiated by a petition of the property <br /> owners. <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br />and Zin~erman. <br />l~endriksen. <br />~he Co~ission authorized Ms. Norris to place an Informational It~ on the <br />next Council agenda regarding the Kovar Plat and the issue of the proposed <br />service road, noting that'any input can be provided to Ms. Norris or the <br />Planning Commission prior to the Planning and Zoning meeting in March, 1985. <br /> ~ Sketch plan Review: _C~ e Of Mr. C~rt Ku,,.,~la: <br /> <br /> Voting Yes: (taiman Peterson, C~'~issioners h'-~z~er, !~nue <br />Votirg No: None. Absent: Co~Mssioners Johnson, Kennen and <br /> <br />Deleted from agenda. <br /> <br />~he C~,ission reviewed those public hearing guidelines C~m~nlssioners De~mer <br />and Zi~merman obtained at a recent s~inar and those hearing guidelines <br />previously approve~, by th...e.Commiss_ion.to.be included in all Planning and <br />Zoning'public hearing mailings, u~m,~ss~on consensus is to re~ain with those <br /> February 19, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 3 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />