Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Geisler responded in the affirmative. She explained the Comprehensive Plan includes <br />general standards for the critical area of the Mississippi River to promote things like water <br />quality and vegetation maintenance. Open space and PUD's are addressed in the plan. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec expressed concern regarding the effect of open space requirements on property <br />owners, while the bridge that will be put through in this area will have a major impact on the <br />atmosphere. <br /> <br />Ms. Geisler indicated staff recognizes the 50% open space requirement in the Comprehensive <br />Plan has big implications for property owners that want to develop. That is why staff is <br />recommending a combination of public and private open space. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen commented privately owned open land is common in other cities. <br /> <br />Ms. Geisler indicated it may be appropriate to require a higher percentage of open space on a <br />property that is directly on the river, while a property up against Highway 10 might have a higher <br />percentage of private open space. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook questioned why the corridor is not more uniform along the river. He <br />noted at one point the corridor actually crosses Highway 10. He commented it seems that a <br />developer could locate the 50% protected land away from the river and build right up to the river, <br />which would not really protect the corridor. <br /> <br />Ms. Geisler explained the corridor is set out in state statute and there is a setback in place. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen suggested staff provide the Council with information regarding <br />requirements that are set out in State Statute versus City Code. <br /> <br />Ms. Geisler advised the City can change the 50% open space requirement, which would require <br />major changes to the Comprehensive Plan. The setbacks are set through State Statute. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec questioned if there may be problems with re-subdivisions in Alpaca Estates if <br />sewer and water comes to that area due to the distance the houses are set back from the river. <br /> <br />Ms. Geisler replied there was a lot of thought put into that issue. There is a clause in the code <br />that allows property owners with less than three acres and City sewer and water to complete a lot <br />split without having to meet the open space requirements. This was done to accommodate the <br />situation at Alpeca Estates. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook inquired if a cluster development could be done in Alpaca Estates. <br /> <br />Ms. Geisler replied staff would encourage that as long as the density requirements are met. City <br />sewer and water would be required for any new lots. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / March 28, 2006 <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />