My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 03/28/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2006
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 03/28/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 4:05:19 PM
Creation date
4/13/2006 2:16:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
03/28/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Geisler responded in the affirmative. She explained the Comprehensive Plan includes <br />general standards for the critical area of the Mississippi River to promote things like water <br />quality and vegetation maintenance. Open space and PUD's are addressed in the plan. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec expressed concern regarding the effect of open space requirements on property <br />owners, while the bridge that will be put through in this area will have a major impact on the <br />atmosphere. <br /> <br />Ms. Geisler indicated staff recognizes the 50% open space requirement in the Comprehensive <br />Plan has big implications for property owners that want to develop. That is why staff is <br />recommending a combination of public and private open space. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen commented privately owned open land is common in other cities. <br /> <br />Ms. Geisler indicated it may be appropriate to require a higher percentage of open space on a <br />property that is directly on the river, while a property up against Highway 10 might have a higher <br />percentage of private open space. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook questioned why the corridor is not more uniform along the river. He <br />noted at one point the corridor actually crosses Highway 10. He commented it seems that a <br />developer could locate the 50% protected land away from the river and build right up to the river, <br />which would not really protect the corridor. <br /> <br />Ms. Geisler explained the corridor is set out in state statute and there is a setback in place. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen suggested staff provide the Council with information regarding <br />requirements that are set out in State Statute versus City Code. <br /> <br />Ms. Geisler advised the City can change the 50% open space requirement, which would require <br />major changes to the Comprehensive Plan. The setbacks are set through State Statute. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec questioned if there may be problems with re-subdivisions in Alpaca Estates if <br />sewer and water comes to that area due to the distance the houses are set back from the river. <br /> <br />Ms. Geisler replied there was a lot of thought put into that issue. There is a clause in the code <br />that allows property owners with less than three acres and City sewer and water to complete a lot <br />split without having to meet the open space requirements. This was done to accommodate the <br />situation at Alpeca Estates. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook inquired if a cluster development could be done in Alpaca Estates. <br /> <br />Ms. Geisler replied staff would encourage that as long as the density requirements are met. City <br />sewer and water would be required for any new lots. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / March 28, 2006 <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.